You pointed out what I read in articles like these — that basically NO criticism of her is ever legitimate, because sexism. Is she supposed to be somehow beyond reproach? Is there anything that the author of this piece WOULD see as a legitimate criticism?

I don’t hate Hillary. If she is nominated I will most likely vote for her. But I dislike her positions on many things, and when she speaks, I don’t trust a word she says. This is not because I’ve bought in to some propaganda about her, it is because I actually listen to her and notice how she artfully appears to answer questions without actually revealing anything. I see her as very similar to Bill in that way, and would criticize them both similarly. That isn’t sexist.