The Nobel Prize for literature? :Haruki Murakami

Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash
In 2018, at the Nobel Prize for literature, some people may know that sex crime scandals and other events are taking place one after another at the Swedish Academy of Screening Organizations, and some people know that this year’s announcement has been delayed.
Under such circumstances, I heard a story that this year only replica literary awards will be awarded to Sweden to create a “new academy”.
According to an article by Mr. Ken Ito of JBPress the day before yesterday,
The contents are as follows:
First of all, the Swedish Academy is doing what never does.
- “Fake Nobel Prize”.
- “Nominate, Leak candidates in advance”.
Four people nominated.
(It is described in the guardian.)
Neil Gaiman
Haruki Murakami
Kim Thuy
Maryse Conde
I saw the name of Haruki Murakami on this list, so I felt a complex feeling.
It is the same as Mr. Ito’s view.
Personally, I do not need the Nobel Prize for literature to come to him, I think he knows that he himself does not come.
Regardless of the aim of the Nobel Prize for literature, Haruki Murakami should express the things that he always feels as a novel, and I think the reader will be satisfied with that.
I read almost his own novels. At the beginning of the year I read a translation book by Raymond Chandler.
Although I am not an enthusiastic fan, I was deeply moved by his novels, deeply recognized the meaning of the word that was exposed there, given a certain weight to my behavior pattern and way of thinking, and gave a standard .
I am very thankful that his novel has brought taste and wisdom to my way of life.
In this way, the novel that left us a long-lasting word is the work of Haruki Murakami, and the rest is a classic novel of China and a highly-valued mystery novel.
Therefore, I made the same idea as Mr. Ito’s opinion about the intention of the replica literary award, so write it.
[the purpose]
In this time, it would be appropriate to look at a certain interest, completely different from the original Nobel Prize, or as a promotional activity that aimed at honor recovery.
We believe that the aim is “to justify the fake-moon”.
In other words, who will be selected for this award this year, will be qualified to receive the real Nobel prize from next year,
Or if he receives a “fake reward”, then will he no longer be eligible to receive real awards?
Naturally, we are concerned about that.
Here, since the original Nobel Prize is said to “announce 2018 years in 2019". If he receives this prize here, he can interpret that he will not receive it from next year.
Mr. Ito said, This is a” new literary prize “which is irrelevant to the Nobel Prize at all and is made for the purpose of. “information dissemination “in obviously temporary, suffering, as long as this year only We have to pay attention to.
If he receives this prize this year, it is equivalent to saying “I do not need a real Nobel Prize for literature”.
Also, if he does not receive it, he will inadvertently cast a popularity vote from his readers and will speak frankly about his greediness of “I want a Nobel prize even if there is anything.”
He is nominated without permission, it is the ultimate choice, such as hell to accept, not hell to accept.
It is exactly “a prisoner ‘s dilemma”.
[Haruki Murakami]
In the living state of hell, Japan’s trendy author Haruki Murakami is placed.
By the way, Mr. Ito states the reason why Haruki Murakami was not likely to take the Nobel Prize for literature.
First, Mr. Ito asserts that since it does not coincide completely with the purpose of Alfred Nobel’s testimony published by the Nobel Foundation,
The intention of setting up the Nobel Prize for literature:
“In honoring the person who brought the greatest public benefit to human beings as a whole”, “One fifth is given to the person who produced the most outstanding work / work in the direction of indicating the ideal in the field of literature “
It is clearly stipulated that there is no such thing as the sales of novels and how the crisis of literature has been done.
In the era of confusion, everyone is unable to find a way to go, and I’m not sure what to do. In such a circumstance, the Alfred · Nobel Commemorative Foundation selects a person who contributed to clearly show the light of hope, “This is it!”, To be awarded the Nobel Prize for literature.

Photo by Ariel Besagar on Unsplash
When I learned Mr. Ito’s idea, I was able to convince clearly what I was concerned in myself.
So I decided that Haruki Murakami did not have a Nobel Prize for literature, and I myself was rebuilt.
To be honest, I have been waiting for expectation that he will get it over the past few years, so there is something tough.
And Mr. Ito says that Haruki Murakami himself will be refreshing himself. In the style of Haruki Murakami recently, I feel that way as well as Mr.Ito.
Well, what about the results? The time to restless came again in Halkist.
