Disruptive Innovation

Through Creative Destruction and S-Curves

Naresh Sekar
3 min readApr 30, 2024

In the ever-evolving landscape of industry and technology, understanding the mechanics behind innovation is crucial for businesses aiming to stay competitive. Two key concepts that provide significant insight into this dynamic are creative destruction, as introduced by Joseph Schumpeter, and the S-Curve model popularized by Richard Foster. Both concepts offer frameworks to understand how new industries rise, old ones decline, and what drives technological progress.

Creative Destruction: The Cycle of Innovation

Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of creative destruction describes an evolutionary process in which new industries emerge, leading to the obsolescence and disappearance of older ones. This constant churn is what drives societal and economic progress. Schumpeter illustrates this process through the example of job evolution:

  • In the early 1900s, industries like blacksmithing and telegraph operation employed hundreds of thousands. Today, these jobs have all but disappeared, replaced by sectors that didn’t exist a century ago, such as computer programming and web development.
  • The number of railroad employees and telegraph operators has drastically decreased, from millions to just thousands or even fewer today.
  • Meanwhile, new roles such as electricians, commercial drivers, and IT professionals have surged, showing how economic forces shift the job market landscape dramatically.

This transformation illustrates the harsh reality of creative destruction: while it fosters innovation and progress, it also leads to the decline of established sectors and jobs.

The S-Curve Model: Mapping Technological Evolution

The S-Curve is a model that traces the life cycle of technologies, products, or industries over time. It is characterized by three phases:

  • Introductory Phase: Early on, significant effort leads to little improvement in performance.
  • Growth Phase: After a certain point, performance improves dramatically as the technology matures.
  • Maturity Phase: Eventually, improvements plateau, and no amount of additional effort leads to significant gains.

This model is crucial for understanding how technological gains are not linear but rather follow a path of rapid innovation followed by a slowdown as technological limits are reached.

Technological Discontinuities and Market Choices

The concept of S-Curves is further complicated by the phenomenon of technological discontinuities. This occurs when a new technology (T2) emerges with initially lower performance compared to the established technology (T1), but improves rapidly:

  • Example of VCRs and DVDs: VCRs were once the dominant technology for video playback, but were overtaken by DVDs, which started with lower performance but quickly surpassed the capabilities of VCRs.
  • Strategic Dilemma: Companies managing older technologies (T1) face a critical decision point: continue improving the old technology with incremental innovations or switch to the emerging technology (T2) that promises greater performance.

This choice is illustrated vividly in industries such as music and automotive:

  • Music Industry: Transitioned from 8-track tapes to cassettes, CDs, MP3s, and now to digital streaming, showing how each technological improvement captures a slice of the market before being replaced by more advanced solutions.
  • Automotive and Airline Industries: General Motors’ decision to stop including CD players in cars and some airlines removing in-seat TV monitors in favor of personal devices reflect shifts in consumer behavior and technological preferences.

Conclusion: Navigating Innovation Cycles

For businesses and strategists, understanding both creative destruction and S-Curves provides essential insights into how to navigate the cycles of innovation effectively. Recognizing the signs of technological takeoff and maturity can help firms make informed decisions about when to invest in emerging technologies versus enhancing existing ones.

In conclusion, the dynamics of disruptive innovation are complex but comprehending these underlying patterns allows businesses to anticipate changes and adapt strategies accordingly, ensuring they remain resilient and competitive in a rapidly changing world.

If you’re eager to expand your knowledge and enjoy a case-study-based approach, you might find the book series “Management In Action” interesting. Since I firmly believe that the pursuit of knowledge should never be limited by financial constraints, you can access all my content for free on my Substack account.

--

--

Naresh Sekar

Loves Engineering Management at scale. Interested in learning via real-world case studies.