Saffronisation Of Indian Leaders
Question on Quora :
Should idiotic people stop the saffronisation of Thiruvalluvar, Sardar Vallabhai Patel, Netaji and Bagath Singh in India?
I’m writing this on medium because Quora is full of devotees ☺
Sardar Vallabhai Patel :

“All their speeches were fill of communal poison, he wrote after banning the Sangh in 1948. "As a final result of the poison, the country had to suffer the sacrifice of the invaluable life of Gandhiji"
This was said by Patel after the death of Gandhiji who was killed by Godse. He banned that organization because most of it’s leaders - Sarvarkar and others were “accused” in Gandhi’s murder.
Now some history :
In their resolution of February 2, 1948, the Government of India declared their determination to root out the forces of hate and violence that are at work in our country and imperil the freedom of the Nation and darken her fair name. In pursuance of this policy the Government of India have decided to declare unlawful the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in the Chief Commissioner’s Provinces. Similar action is also being taken in the Governor’s Provinces. As democratic governments, the Government of India and the provincial governments have always been anxious to allow reasonable scope for genuine political, social and economic activities to all parties and organisations including those whose policies and purposes differ from, or even run counter to their own, subject to the consideration that such activities should not transgress certain commonly recognised limits of propriety or law. The professed aims and objects of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh are to promote the physical, intellectual and moral well–being of the Hindus and also to foster feelings of brotherhood, love and service amongst them. Government themselves are most anxious to improve the general material and intellectual well–being of all sections of the people and have got schemes on hand which are designed to carry out these objects, particularly the provision of physical training and education in military matters to the youth of the country. Government have, however, noticed with regret that in practice members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh have not adhered to their professed ideals. Undesirable and even dangerous activities have been carried on by members of the Sangh. It has been found that in several parts of the country individual members of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh have indulged in acts of violence involving arson, robbery, dacoity, and murder and have collected illicit arms and ammunition. They have been found circulating leaflets exhorting people to resort to terrorist methods, to collect firearms, to create disaffection against the government and suborn the police and the military. These activities have been carried on under a cloak of secrecy, and the government have considered from time to time how far these activities rendered it incumbent on them to deal with the Sangh in its corporate capacity. The last occasion when the government defined this attitude was when the Premiers and the Home Ministers of provinces met in Delhi in conference towards the end of November. It was then unanimously agreed that the stage when the Sangh should be dealt with as an association had not yet arrived and that individuals should continue to be dealt with sternly as hitherto. The objectionable and harmful activities of the Sangh have, however, continued unabated and the cult of violence sponsored and inspired by the activities of the Sangh has claimed many victims. The latest and the most precious to fall was Gandhiji himself. In these circumstances it is the bounden duty of the government to take effective measures to curb this reappearance of violence in a virulent form and as a first step to this end, they have decided to declare the Sangh as an unlawful association. Government have no doubt that in taking this measure they have the support of all law–abiding citizens, of all those who have the welfare of the country at heart.
Source : The Wire
Patel had banned the organization which produced most leaders in BJP right now. They are celebrating now because Whatsapp heroes want to defame Nehru.
Netaji :

I can speak very boldly because I belong to AIFB, a party which was founded by Netaji after his split from the Congress.
AIFB is a leftist party & BJP has no rights to saffronize my leader because when Netaji was fighting so hard and adopting various techniques, these people from Sangh Pariwar what were they doing?
Hindutva ideologue Savarkar, the progenitor of Hindutva and Hindu nation ideology, propagated at that time that Hindu nationalists should help British in their war efforts against Japan and Germany. RSS Sarsanghchalak MS Golwalkar also went on to instruct all its branches not to do anything which will annoy British and kept aloof from the anti-British struggles. So, while Congress was putting pressure on British through Quit India movement, Netaji was fighting British through INA, Savarkar was proactively helping British by helping them in recruitment for armed forces. In a way RSS did nothing which went against British rule.
One must note that RSS hoisted Indian flag after 52 years. Funny fact is that they said “Government regulations” but what is the truth?
Well. Thank you ALT news for breaking the propaganda :)
How can BJP saffronize a red?

Party flag & my wallpaper : AIFB.
History Shows How Patriotic the RSS Really Is

What is this ra? Fake Patriots
Bhagat Singh :

Now coming to Bhagat Singh, if he was alive today - BJP would have called him Urban Naxal. BJP is purely based out of religious politics & Bhagat Singh hated religions because he followed Marxist idelogies.

Source : Bhagat Singh’s book may leave BJP red-faced
prison diary: Bhagat Singh’s book may leave BJP red-faced | India News - Times of India
Bhagat Singh hated religion as well as religious politics because marx followers were atheists.
He also questioned about the existence of God : Where is God? What is he doing?: Bhagat Singh on religion
How can you saffronize an atheist?
Thiruvalluvar :
Thirukural is called as “Ulaga Podhumarai” meaning it is for all and if it was based on any religion nobody would accept it worldwide. You can bring whatever proofs you have misinterpreted from it but saffronizing him will never do the work.
Answer to Why are all of a sudden heated arguments about the Thirukkural and Tiruvalluvar in Tamil Nadu? by Navin Niish (நவீன் நீஷ்) Navin Niish (நவீன் நீஷ்)'s answer to Why are all of a sudden heated arguments about the Thirukkural and Tiruvalluvar in Tamil Nadu?
This answer for some juice :)
BJP or Saffron gang never had a freedom fighter on their own. The Sangh parivar never participated in the freedom movement. They oppose Gandhiji and that is why they are trynna use all the other people who were with Gandhi & Nehru.
I also broke some major lies by Nationalists against Gandhi & co.
Nehruvian economy + Nehru’s Secularism is something BJP will never understand.
Atalji was a gem and he participated because he was a communist at that time.
Patel was always a Gandhian & there was a reason for making Nehru as PM
Bose’s left wing ideology never coincided with RSS or Saffron Gang.
Bhagat Singh is just anti-national to these people if he was alive.
Sayonora ☺
