Jul 28, 2017 · 1 min read
I don’t quite agree with your policy. I think there is nothing wrong in general with allowing Bitcoin forks to be traded.
What should be important though is that the customers should always understand clearly which one is Bitcoin, and which one is the fork. So the fork should always have a clearly different name.
BCC had a different name and symbol, so it should have been allowed to be traded.
I also think your policy of not allowing trade of Bitcoin forks is bound to fail in case forks will be created that are backed by substantial hashpower, as it’s quite likely to happen in the near future.
