Neverender
Jul 23, 2017 · 1 min read

Please don’t be a dilettante.

It’s not collusion. What you’re saying is just parroting what other talking heads have incorrectly stated. Collusion has a very real meaning in an illegal sense — it is a superset of fraud. This was not collusion.

Without breaking the law or discussion about breaking the law, this is not collusion. Until more facts are known, this is still information sharing about Clinton’s illegal activity, which actually was good for people to know.

If the meeting was about how that information was obtained or encouraging illegal activity, it would be different, but there isn’t anything to support that’s what happened.


What have we learned? Repeating the incorrect words of taking heads only makes you a parrot and proof by assertion is not proof.