“Steven”,

I started to read what you wrote, but it was a little bit long in the tooth.

I stopped when I saw you don’t realize the difference between questions and assertions (pretty early on). I didn’t assert that men are only slaves, I only asked what the OP constitutes as being a man?

If you can’t grasp the notion that doing things for your family first (e.g., them over loafers) is one trait of being a family man, you may need some help. As people like to say — you’re part of the problem.

So continue to snivel, call me a ‘boy’, I’m confident in my role. It makes me sad for you when I saw you repeatedly say that — it reminds me of a former slave owner that doesn’t understand the world is now against him — you’re on the losing end.

If you expected my string of questions to be the definition of man, I’m sorry, they’re not. It wasn’t a comprehensive thoroughly defined paper. At most they are only certain attributes that an ideal man exert. Mind you there are also legal and social understandings of man.

Anyhow, get back to understanding the fundamentals of what I said and re-reply, or edit your work and I’ll revisit. I thank you for spending so much time, just sorry it was wasted effort.

Take care.