David Rose
Sep 19, 2014 · 5 min read
9/11 conspiracy theories about controlled demolition are part of the official cover up.

Evidence of a 9/11 cover up, not “conspiracy theory”.

by David Rose, March 8th 2016

Once you understand that 9/11 “controlled demolition” theories and “No plane hit the Pentagon” You Tube enabled speculation are both wrong and a distraction from the official 9/11 cover up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzkd0C2t2s8 you will find a rich source of evidence in the declassified official 9/11 investigation documents, about who knew what, when and who was to blame for allowing 9/11 to happen. Lets be 100% clear about this: 9/11 could have been prevented by something as simple as one person in a department of 50 people in the CIA (Alec Station) just picking up a telephone and telling the FBI that two known Al Qaeda terrorists (AlMihdhar and AlHamzi) had entered the US with intentions to carry out a terrorist attack. These two terrorists would have been found rapidly by the FBI and the 9/11 plot would have been stopped. The paper trail of declassified CIA cables show almost all of Alec Station knew the two terrorists had entered America. They deliberately stopped that information from reaching the FBI for a period of over 18 months: http://28pages.org/2015/09/11/former-fbi-agent-mark-rossini-driven-to-expose-cias-911-secret/ The CIA then lied about their criminal with-holding of information to the 9/11 investigations. Watch George Tenet lie to the US Congress in this video when he says, “I know that nobody read that cable” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8j43j_dWVU The published final reports and declassified documents from the 9/11 Joint Inquiry, the 9/11 Commission and the various specific agency OIG reports allow the determined, independent researcher to focus on the key aspects of the 9/11 “intelligence failures”, which are so far unexplained and covered up:

1) Why did the CIA with-hold knowledge of 9/11 hijackers AlHamzi and AlMhidhar’s presence in the United States from the FBI for over a year? Why did the CIA cover up their surveillance and protection of Al-Hamzi and Al-Mhidar, when they were living inside America? Why did the CIA criminally obstruct the FBI’s investigation into Al Qaeda’s attack on the USS Cole in Yemen? http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/07/10/the-agent Did the CIA with-hold information from the FBI about the 9/11 hijackers in order to stop those inside CIA Alec Station from going to jail for criminally obstructing the FBI’s investigation into the USS Cole attack — which would have exposed CIA knowledge of the Al Qaeda 9/11 planning meeting in Malaysia between 5–8th January 2000? If the CIA had told the FBI about AlHamzi and AlMhidhar’s presence in the US, the 9/11 plot would have been stopped. This is the opinion of Richard Clarke, Ali Soufan, Mark Rossini and many others. This is the smoking gun of 9/11. https://vimeo.com/155917432 Apportioning blame and criminal accountability was avoided by the 9/11 Commission: it was “a failure of imagination” in the US intelligence community that allowed 9/11 to happen. The final report did not blame 9/11 on any one agency or individual. Blame and accountability was supposed to be dealt with by the Office of Inspector General’s reports. When the 9/11 CIA OIG report was finally published it recommended accountability boards for George Tenet, Cofer Black, Richard Blee, Tom Wilshire and others in CIA, to answer for their actions. The CIA and the President chose to completely ignore this recommendation by the CIA’s own Inspector General. The CIA OIG report is up on the CIA website for all to read here: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/2015-press-releases-statements/cia-releases-declassified-documents-related-to-9-11-attacks.html Instead of accountability boards recommended by the Inspector General John Helgerson, those in CIA responsible for allowing 9/11 to happen were promoted or given lucrative contracts in private security companies. For example Alfreda Francies Bikowsky stopped an FBI agent inside CIA Alec Station from sending a cable warning the FBI that Al-Mihdar had a visa to enter the US. Instead of being fired Alfreda was given cover status after 9/11 and was a key player in the illegal CIA torture program and Iraq WMD lies. https://theintercept.com/2014/12/19/senior-cia-officer-center-torture-scandals-alfreda-bikowsky/ Alfreda allowed 9/11 to happen but was promoted and not fired. When Cofer Black left the CIA he became a millionaire as a senior executive at Blackwater, the private military contractor. The people responsible for allowing 9/11 to happen were rewarded and not punished. Think about that for a minute. See more evidence here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuixP6qJ-mpGeR8gVrTHLmE2A_OTofTHr

2) Why was the Saudi support network inside the US for 9/11 covered up in the redacted 28 pages of the 9/11 Joint Inquiry? http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/twenty-eight-pages Why did the CIA rely on the Saudi state intelligence agency (the GID) for their surveillance of known Al Qaeda operatives in the US, when many in the Saudi royal family were actively funding and supporting Osama Bin Laden’s plan to attack America? Evidence suggests there was a failed attempt by CIA Alec Station to recruit Al-Mihdar and Al-Hazmi as double agents inside Al Qaeda https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTJu2Q7CVQw and that this failed operation was covered up by the 9/11 Commission, to save the CIA from embarrassment and the wrath of the American people. See more evidence here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuixP6qJ-mpH1YeHWqn1FGxG7bkB862Zo

3) How did the NSA get away without any blame or censure from the 9/11 Commission for their malfeasance and accountablity for 9/11? For example the NSA knew Al-Mhidar was calling the Al Qaeda communication hub from San Diago, USA but lied about this to the 9/11 investigations: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/01/13/the-al-qaeda-switchboard NSA then used their lies about not knowing the calls they intercepted to the Yemen hub had originated in San Diago, to justify their post 9/11 dragnet surviellance of Americans and the wider world in collaboration with GCHQ http://newacademic.tumblr.com/post/124752816377/james-bamford-is-the-nsa-lying-about-its-failure As we know from Edward Snowden’s leaks, the National Security Agency is the largest and most powerful intelligence agency in America and the world. Why did’nt the 9/11 Commission investigate the NSA when it attempted to understand the 9/11 “intelligence failures”? http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/09/10/911-mystery-nsa-files-on-al-qaeda-attack-never-probed.html This omission by the 9/11 Commission looks like a deliberate cover up, once we know that NSA knew that Al-Mihdar was calling the Al Qaeda Yemen switchboard from San Diego. Evidence from ex-NSA officer Thomas Drake, who was part of the official Congressional investigations into 9/11, also suggests the NSA had enough information to know about the 9/11 attack before it happened and to stop it, as a stand alone agency, i.e. without the need to share information with any other US intelligence agency, which is the usual excuse given in the official story for why 9/11 happened. http://newacademic.tumblr.com/post/89354012532/declassify-thomas-drakes-suppressed-911

Listen to this 30 minute interview with former Senator Bob Graham (ex-head of the Senate Intelligence Committee and co-chair of the 9/11 Joint Congressional Inquiry), for an in-depth discussion of the above issues: https://soundcloud.com/newacademic/graham-interview

    David Rose

    Written by

    Researching 9/11 and its effects. https://t.co/ebD1nGJGXI