The MOOC Trap

Nicholas Beaudoin
4 min readSep 25, 2022

--

Authors Note: This piece was originally published by the author in December 2017 on translatingnerd.com

Type in “learn to become a data scientist” into Google and you will get the following results: DataCamp, Udacity, Udemy, Coursera, DataQuest, etc. These Massive Open Online Courses, MOOCs for short, are invaluable when learning a new skill set. They allow students to enter a once-guarded elite within the academic walls. They sharpen skill sets and add value to any resume.

The MOOC feels so good, but take too many, you will fail to achieve what you started — credit

However, I have noticed that they have become a crutch that is traded for comfort over the rigors of self-improvement past a certain point. This realization is not placed on others but is reflected in my own beginnings in data science post-grad school. We strive to learn the most advanced methods, the coolest visualizations, and the highest-performing algorithms. Yet, we seldom strive for originality in our work because we are afraid it might be too mundane, lack originality, and show us as imposters in the field.

To add to one’s proverbial toolkit in data science, MOOCs and educational resources that guide the user through a well-formatted analysis are crucial. Outside of learning on the job, there are few means to learn new methods other than structured educational materials. But this can lead to the “MOOC trap.” A typical case study of the MOOC trap is the burgeoning data scientist who has completed an intensive 6-month online program. She has dedicated 300 hours of intense study, through both sandbox exercises and a few semi-structured projects. She feels like she has a basic understanding of a host of skills, but is timid to try her analytical toolset on a problem of her choosing. Instead, she signs up for another 6-month MOOC, a mere regurgitation of the material that she just covered. Enamored with the ads and displays of a polished portfolio on GitHub that the MOOC promises, she forks over another $200 a month, chasing the promise that she will be “job ready.”

MOOC tagline: “You can be a data scientist in 6 weeks” — credit

There are myriad datasets that we as a community have access to, structured and unstructured, clean and well, terribly scattered and messy. We are trained through our educational systems in college/grad school, online courses, and structured tutorials, to create something advanced and analytically perfect. We are pressured to post this to GitHub, to display our certification of accomplishment with a stamp from an official organization.

Post MOOC, not “gitting” it. — credit

This individual graduated from their respective graduate program, or boot camp, feeling the excitement of looking for a question, venturing the internet for a dataset, and exasperated by the struggle as she looked at the mess that real-world data provides. But she regressed back to the comfort of the MOOC. Like a warm cup of cocoa on a cold winter day, the MOOC offers guidance and a linear path. It is tough, but not too tough, so participants feel they are making progress.

Similar to the MOOC trap promise of data science enlightenment, the Venus Fly Trap draws its prey in with the smell of nectar. — credit

The problem with the MOOC trap is that it no longer trains us for the real world; it trains us to become great followers of directions. We fear that our analysis of an original piece of work will not be cool enough, it will not be advanced enough, and well, we might have to grind just to produce an exploratory analysis of things that we might have already assumed. But this is the challenge, to create something original because it gives us ownership. Completing basic analytics with an original dataset that we went out and found adds to the data science community. This builds the foundations of what science is and hones our fundamental skills so sorely needed in the workforce.

Real data science is messy, embrace it — credit

While MOOCs offer a structured and nicely formatted addition to our repositories/portfolios of glistening analytical work, it has the potential to leave us in a comfortable position where growth decays. There is a certain point to where educational training and online courses can take us, but beyond that, it is a series of diminishing returns. Each nascent data scientist will have a different inflection point, but the feeling is the same; you have a burning question, but feel your skillset is unpracticed. In this instance, forgo the MOOC and find the data in the world. Produce the basic analysis, ask your peers to review, and struggle a little more. Only then will we grow as data scientists.

--

--

Nicholas Beaudoin

Nicholas is an accomplished data scientist with 10 years in federal and commercial consulting practice. He specializes in ML operations (MLOps).