Nice data, shame about the quality

I have been known to attend one or two hack events. What is the most common feature mentioned? Of course it is data quality.

I was at one event a couple of years ago where one of the developers’ presentation was purely about the quality of the data supplied. Our friend Pareto would probably say that 80% of effort is cleaning up data, 20% is building something.

The same happened at Accountability Hack 21–22 November:


This is where I can hear my high horse trotting around the stable, pawing the ground, getting ready to be saddled up.

Clearly there are some transitory problems. Very few organisations are looking at processes involving data from end to end and considering wider data consumers as part of their data ecosystem.

Often this is because data is being generated as the by product of delivering services (‘exhaust fumes’), not delivering transparency or data. Clearly this needs to change.

If these processes change will this solve everything? Probably not. The whole point about hack events and external consumers needs is that often they are about being innovative and people wanting to do things differently. Unless there is a data crystal ball lying around this will always throw up challenges to the way data is presented.

However maybe some of these issues can be mitigated?

How about an internal data manifesto?

Data is our biggest asset
We are a data driven organisation/society
All our data is valuable
We should value our data
It is not our data as we hold it in trust for others
We are the custodians of our data for future generations
We must know how society wants to use the data we generate
Data is at the heart of what we do, how we operate and how we benefit society
Like what you read? Give Nick M Halliday a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.