Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read
But just as his entire argument is based on his “authoritatively” stated distinctions of human gender, so too is yours based on dismissing these distinctions seemingly out of hand — and you even admit that you have no expertise to do so. So…why should you be believed and not him? Your take on teamwork and so forth makes sense, but your long castigation of him for simply offering the argument at all — as though his raising the issue for discussion is somehow his worst, most “damaging” act, is itself a scary sort of censorship, as well as political correctness run comfortably amok.