Uncensored

nauro kabooz
Aug 22, 2017 · 3 min read

The building sector suffers form a lack of productivity gains. So it is said. But who cares? Only stingy people care. Wielding a hammer is great. Far greater than feeling the blood cloth up and the Gates cancer swell. AI can supposedly drive everything into more efficiency but nobody wants it. It is not OK.

It is not OK for ‘professors’ to destroy jobs and to research the technologies to do so in a ‘wir haben es nicht gewusst’ type of work, that was used by nazis to deny active involvement in racism and indiscriminate murder: genocide on an industrial scale. This time it’s Larry Page hydro-foiling through the San Fransisco Bay that is commanding the murder of simple people. Under the guise of Jewishness he thinks he can get away with anything. I doubt he ever sees the inside of a schul (Jewish philosophers have been very humanist). Only looking at his bank accounts. Same for Gates, sitting still gives you cancer. Good luck.

Efficiency is only gained when the people involved become more productive not by devolving them. The legal variant allows them to find something useful to do if futile work is automated or to preferably increase their productivity through newly available tools and means of production. But self driving cars just promise to allow drivers to sit still or put a VR helmet on or watch sponsored entertainment. This is a dismal prospect.

Personally, I am fond of the earliest automobiles. Recent models, including the Teslas don’t do me much. Silence is and 0-pollution are fantastic but they have a massive flat screen in the console.

If there is any place for AI in cars, it is not to take over the driving. Driving is after all great, it’s great to do. There are some few times when it isn’t. But I would rather see driving become free than automatic. I would rather have time to drive through small French towns for a few months and meet the people than have AI driving my car. I would loath playing a video game in the back seat for more than a few minutes. I would rather have a convertible and nice weather. A driving commute is a pain, but I would enjoy a drone commute even less.

So what is this all about? Technology wanting a solution for a problem that only exists in the head of people haters? This is what the neo-nazis meant in Charlottesville when they viciously screamed that Jews will not replace them. It is a consequence of unfettered capitalism. Of tasteless and mindless faith in technology over humans. The nazis miss the argument obviously. But who can blame them? They are inbred.

There seems to be in fact little need for efficiency gains at the moment. Old companies are negatively dubbed ‘zombie’ when they are kept alive by quantitative easing. It is a little too conservative for my taste to say old companies must stay alive, but there is a lot of opportunity now to choose and restructure companies based on more solid ground than profitability. There is no need for more efficient driving in itself. You can argue it is silly for everyone to sit in a queue on the road, as much as most herd behavior is silly, but the focus should be on the Eudaimonia (happiness).

Quantitative easing makes the lower class the same off and the middle class worse off. Luckily the middle class usually is intimidated by having a criminal record, censorship, brainwashing, education and all the other inductions of trained meekness. The rich supposedly enjoy higher asset values but taken at face value this means very little. In fact it proves the uselessness of the rich. If they were killed, it wouldn’t matter. The supposed value they create is still kept intact by the central banks. They could be expropriated but, it is fairer to force them to time share: there are empty mansions next to Grenfell tower. The owner can use them when they want, on short notice but when they are yachting in the Caribbean, poor people don’t need to be burned alive.

)