Trump Is Too Politically Correct…

To Call It A Muslim Ban

What happened to this no-nonsense, straight-shooter?

Remember when President Trump boldly called for a Muslim ban?

Remember when everyone cheered when he repeated it at his rallies?

Where did this Trump go?
The one that swept the Electoral College, and would have won the popular vote, if you deduct the millions of illegals.

Everyone heard him, so why beat around the bush?

As the President put it, the Ban was one of his most popular orders!

Suddenly, everyone’s too politically correct to call it like it is!

Has everyone gone mad or come down with a case of Liberalitis?

As Trump proclaimed in an interview with Anderson Cooper, Islam hates us.

Why would we let these haters in our country? How does that Make America Great Again?

President Trump’s first executive order was already a watered-down ban, which tried to avoid the machinations of liberal activist judges.

And that’s where he went wrong. 
This watered-down executive order gave activist judge James Robart the opening to grant a temporary restraining order due to “immediate and irreparable injury”. He went so far as to say that no arrests had been made “of foreign nationals from those seven countries since 9/11.” Has he never heard of the Bowling Green massacre?

Then, I was as amazed as Attorney General Jeff Sessions to find that “a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power.” That’s what happened when Island Heritage Judge Derrick Watson blocked the watered-down version of the watered-down ban, because allegedly its aim was to “suspend the entry of Muslims”.

The problem is that Executive Orders, no matter how politically correct, will always be challenged by activist liberal judges. I mean, how is it even logical for judges to take campaign promises and public statements by elected officials into account, when no one takes their pandering seriously?

Now look at Taiwanese Heritage Judge Theodore Chuang’s reasoning behind the injunction on the Muslim Ban II. He conveniently ignored the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which states:

“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate”

And instead focused on the newer Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which amended the previous:

“No person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence”

With all these diversity-hire activist judges, how can law and order prevail? FDR incarcerated the Japanese. Ike had Operation Wetback. Why can’t Trump ban the Muslims?

That’s why we need to take judicial oversight away from these judges, by having Congress make the First Amendment perfectly clear on this matter:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, except when the President deems it necessary and until he can figure out what the hell is going on;

Never again will we have a bleeding heart liberal like Ronald Reagan apologize for interning Japanese saboteurs (Civil Liberties Act of 1988). Never again will we have liberal snowflakes apologize for “racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.”
Never again will we have to call a Muslim ban, totally-not-a-Muslim-ban.

The Muslim ban press release was on the official Trump campaign website from December 7, 2015 until May 9, 2017