UFO Coverup Continues
AARO’s report wasn’t just incompetence.
The All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office or AARO just released volume one of their historical report. The problem? The report is not just bad but is beyond incompetence and probably intentional. Some aspects of the report probably are incompetence, for example, initially writing that Harry Reid was a senator from New Mexico. This was probably a rough draft error, that made it through to the final, we all make mistakes I guess. However, some of the reports seemed intentional and meant to diminish actual whistleblowers. There’s no mention of either David Fravor, the pilot who was a witness at the Nimitz event, or David Grusch, the whistleblower who interviewed 40 or so primary witnesses and was read into crash retrieval programs of crashes by non-human intelligence.
They did manage to mention, one David, David Norquist, a former deputy secretary of defense but neither of the other two Davids made it into the report. Anything they said was ignored and the report seemed dismissive of both of their testimony. There were many important witnesses left out of the report like Robert Dean, Phillip J. Corso, Clifford Stone, Robert Salas, and so on. The former head of AARO, Sean Kirkpatrick has been openly hostile to both David Grusch and David Fravor and any other witnesses with claimed actual knowledge. This doesn’t seem like simple incompetence since they managed to include Wilbert Smith, a lesser-known Canadian official, but didn’t expand much on him.
AARO has been described as Blue Book 2.0 and it seems that way. No evidence, that they did any serious investigation into the UFO subject. This seems to be beyond making a few mistakes and is evidenced by the former head of AARO’s hostility to whistleblowers. They cited Blue Book’s conclusions that none of the sightings were extraterrestrial, verbatim even though Blue Book maintained that around 5% of the sightings remained unidentified. Blue Book was wrong then and now, I don’t know how multiple anomalous aircraft flying close to American shops is not a danger or a possible problem. Part of the problem is that David is undergoing a whistleblower retaliation investigation and AARO isn’t equipped to handle this as Matthew Pines has stated, they don’t have much power to push past the gatekeeping of these programs. They seem more like a coverup operation. Some parts read like that explicitly.
There is a conviction among some Americans that the USG has conducted a deception operation to conceal the fact that it has recovered extraterrestrial spacecraft and alien beings as well as systematically exploited and reverse-engineered extraterrestrial technology.126 This perception probably has been fueled by key UFO investigators’ public comments. For example, J. Allen Hynek of Project BLUE BOOK, said that the USAF expected him to perform the role of debunker; and Capt Ruppelt, the first chief of BLUE BOOK, later wrote that he was expected to explain away every report and that the USAF sought to produce press stories in alignment with the USAF’s position.
That’s because there was a coverup and still is and AARO is playing into that. Countless whistleblowers and testimonies over the years are all wrong including photos and videos and somehow AARO is right to just ignore it all despite interviewing countless witnesses? Some parts are accurate at all, yes there are a few individuals associated with AATIP that were involved like Lue Elizondo and James Lackatski but not everyone is. Was Robert Dean, Jesse Marcel, or Phillip Corso, directly involved with AATIP? They lived and even died long before there even was an AATIP.
AARO researched and interviewed numerous people, programs, and leads. It has determined that modern allegations that the USG is hiding off-world technology and beings largely originate from the same group of individuals who have ties to the cancelled AAWSAP/AATIP program and a private sector organization’s paranormal research efforts. These individuals have worked with each other consistently in various UAP-related efforts
The report isn’t all that bad at times and has some very good historical cases including various projects like Grudge and Sign. In addition, some statements in the report probably are true to some extent for example and the White House is lying about it or misinformed. For example, the report says that the White House conducted a study into the effects of extraterrestrial contact but later denied this to AARO.
UAP Disclosure Study: Interviewees’ claims that between 2004 and 2007 the White House requested a research institute in Virginia study the theoretical societal impacts of disclosing that UAP are extraterrestrial in origin; AARO confirmed the study was conducted, but it was not requested by the White House.
We know the RAND Corporation has done this before in the Brookings Report, but I’m not sure if this is the same organization they are describing. There are many organizations in the Washington-NOVA area including RAND, but also MITRE that could possibly be the source. Nick Redfern in his book describes his source “Dr. Mandor” who also talks about a White House NSC program to study UFOs and extraterrestrial abductions.
Dr. Mandor informed me that Reagan had a personal UFO encounter in 1974, and that this experience, along with his subsequent interest in the phenomenon and a classified briefing on UFOs he received from the National Security Council the day after viewing E.T. led the White House to conduct a secret study in 1982 into the national security implications of the alleged large-scale kidnapping of American citizens by forces unknown — alien abductions, in other words.
I’m not sure if this is related to AARO’s investigation but it probably is at least adjacent. Some of the interviews discussed are well known for example, Michael Herrera is a former Marine who said that he saw special operations loading containers onto extraterrestrial spacecraft.
An interviewee who is a former U.S. service member said that in 2009, while participating in a humanitarian and security mission in a foreign country, he encountered “U.S. Special Forces” loading containers onto a large extraterrestrial spacecraft. 94
This was a real event and Michael seemed sincere. Some of these witnesses sound similar to what Dan Sherman has said or various other whistleblowers over the years. Including overhearing conversations about aliens being present on the base.
Another interviewee claimed that in the 1990s he overhead electronic communication of a conversation between two military bases where scientists claimed “aliens” were present during specialized materials testing.93 The interviewee also reported that on another occasion in the 1990s he observed an “unidentified flying object” at a U.S. military facility. The interviewee described the object as exhibiting a peculiar flight pattern.
One thing I don’t understand is considering all this testimony and the various photos and videos over the years. How AARO doesn’t conclude that something unusual is going on and there may not only be an ET presence but a coverup at the highest levels. I don’t entirely blame AARO, it’s a coverup that goes beyond just them. However, it’s clear that AARO could have done a better job and included the other Davids involved in the UAP house hearing. It seems as if they weren’t interested in investigating them at all which supports the idea that there is a coverup.
By stating that most of the sightings were secret military craft then AARO is implicitly admitting we have aircraft that can pull 100g without a hitch and no harm to the pilot which should be impossible by current standards. AARO seems designed to obfuscate and cover up and we shouldn’t expect much out of the office, to be honest. If I’m honest I think this goes very deep and I believe people like Corey Goode who say they were taken as children to Carswell AFB to train in space operations. This isn’t just an AARO coverup thing. Regardless, the truth in time will be revealed and we might find that AARO was just a cover operation covering up the rabbit hole.
