This story is unavailable.

I agree with the principle, but it’s still creating a totem. I think wikipedia generally has better empiricism, but at the same time, a single source for information is potentially dangerous. I’m not assuming they have insidious intentions, or anything similar. I’m just saying the sword does cut both ways.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.