Priceless.

I’m struggling too I suppose…

I can’t quite figure out…

…if you’re being deliberately obtuse… or you’re just… well, obtuse? Either way, it’s obvious you have some obsequious devotion to Janus and his perfidious Queen of Chaos… wow, it’s almost RELIGIOUS… and maybe you can’t seem to accept the true information that was revealed about her (ouch) and our war-loving Obama… who I voted for twice by the way. As Pilger recently said, “the sycophancy ran like a polluted babbling brook.” Surely, I must have touched a nerve. What’s comical yet sadly far too in vogue, is the sheer lack of substance to YOUR claim… prosing on in utter vacuity compared to the veritable avalanche of evidence compiled in my paper. I suppose in your post-fact world, things are fabricated just because YOU SAY SO. And attacking the messenger then spares you from dealing with the substantive content of the message. Alas, why bother with substance? Why bother when one can simply deny facts and sources and remain ignorant of the truth? What a convenient arrangement, and so familiar. Funny thing though, I’ve never before seen someone admit there’s a lot of smoke, but then deny it’s because of a fire. And the smoke just keeps billowing. Even more ironic are the things that you DO claim to believe that have no evidentiary basis at all, that are indeed contradicted by the available body of evidence. I gather you can’t be bothered with self-study or critical thought either.

So… if one is to believe your evidence free claim, then they must also believe that in substantially unanimous coordination, the following government agencies, liberal think tanks and NGO’s have also been lying, forging documents, writing fake reports and furthering false narratives: The Nobel Prize Committee, The State Dept. FOIA archive, The Dept. of Energy, The Dept. of Defense, The Atlantic Council, Council on Foreign Relations, The United Nations, Unicef, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, International Peace Bureau, The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Federation of American Scientists, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, Arms Control Association and Obama’s Whitehouse Archives…

…along with these mostly left leaning progressive or liberal publications posting scores of fake articles all over the internet: Washington Post, Huffington Post, CNN, Politico, The Guardian, Slate, USA Today, Mother Jones, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, , Consortium News, The Nation, The Intercept, Counterpunch, Truthout, Salon, to name a few…

…which were written by some of the most highly acclaimed journalists: John Pilger, Glenn Greenwald, Dave Lindorff, Stephen Cohen, Norman Pollack, Alexander Cockburn, Jeffrey St. Clair, Paul Street, Pepe Escobar, Norman Solomon, Robert Parry, et al… all of whom decided to throw journalistic integrity to the wind and falsely twist Obama’s own public statements… and dubiously disclose Clinton’s pretend emails that couldn’t possibly have been obtained from the State Department FOIA archives… not to mention ignoring donor information on The Clinton Foundation website that apparently, according to you and YOU ALONE, erroneously lists a whole bunch of Sunni Arabs and Saudis as having donated somewhere between $27 & $80 million. Given all that’s out there, I was in fact, quite kind. If all this came from the left, then just imagine what the right is saying.

So yeah, it’s either believable that I and all of these folks are lying about Obama’s 8 years of rapacious war and Hillary’s naked display of corruption and categorical foreign policy failure, OR…

…it is YOU who is lying.

Well to be fair, and I really want to be fair… you could just be steeping in denial, with a healthy dollop of hypocrisy (faking) added on top for good measure. But then again, wouldn’t that still be you lying, albeit, TO YOURSELF?

“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance — that principle is contempt prior to investigation.” William Paley, c. 1794