the introvert
Aug 8, 2017 · 1 min read

sorry, likability does not speak to more subtle character traits as compunction, and integrity. If it did, than we’d be voting for flawed characters. Trump, a case in point, ad nauseum. However, negating Trump does not make Hillary the automatic better choice. The overblown measures of her achievements have never really been quantified in any coherent fashion, nor could she intelligibilize any semblance of a campaign platform. The people who voted for her because they either liked her, or wanted a woman as president — any woman.

The masses have no attention span for 4 decades of shenanigans and outright impropriety by these grifters, who started out as small time corrupt lawyers who brown nosed their way into government.

Those a bit older are more familiar with the particulars of 4 decades of grifting, boozing, cheating, lying, slutting, and paying people to keep quiet. I believe it was her husband who had a corruptive influence on her. She was fine as a children’s advocate. I think she should have stayed as such.

Not for nothing, the polls report 15% of her voters regretted voting for her, and would not do so again. It must be more with Trump, though this is not an apt comparison: a rotten papaya as compared to a pumpkin with a stocking pulled over its head.

    the introvert

    Written by

    Deconstructionist, flaneur, debunker, and pookah