How in principle are you different from the religious radicals who (where I live, which isn’t “first world”) successfully no-platformed gay rights advocates (that is, people who advocate for rights of people like me) on the ground of there being no such thing as “two sides” to debate about teleological properties of human sexuality?

As far as I see from where I sit (a non-heterosexual person in a rather unfriendly third-worldy country), you are akin to those religious radicals, because you use their methods and their arguments.

The monsters you fight. You have become like them.