Jul 22, 2017 · 1 min read
I have some problem with calling Geiling a reporter. There is no sign of impartial coverage of facts in her essay — starting with the header that Trump/Clovia does not believe in ‘climate.’ That is classic misrepresentation…and it does not get better. Mind, calling ‘climate science’ a running joke notes that lack of funding for study of natural change is the inevitable consequence of claiming that all questions and disagreements are to be ignored …regardless of the fact that daily temperatures vary far more than projected change of averages of land temperatures….a moot ‘analysis’ which makes ‘consensus’ of true believers even less authoritative.
