It could be my confirmation bias, but more time passes more CTOR appear a solution searching for a problem to solve.
IMHO (I’m not a developer but I know a thing or two about p2p systems and scaling) other solutions for scaling make every possible advantage to switching to CTOR minuscole or irrelevant where the costs (in the general sense) remain the same or increases.
E.G.
When weak blocks are deployed, the block miners are searching is build in stages as transactions are received. Weak blocks do not touch the current consensus mechanism, just allow the miners to converge freely on a common block template (same transactions, ordered in the same way). They have an incentive to converge on one block template because it reduce the verification time when the actual block is found.
Instead of sharding on different machines at the same time it shards in time on a single machine. And has no consensus changing prerequisites to work.
