You’ve just confirmed the primary claim of the guy’s “manifesto”. Your deliberate misrepresentation of what the man said is profoundly dishonest.
The fact that just writing something that is *entirely* reasonable and factual gets you condemned and fired is exactly what he was trying to object to in his letter!
You claim that he makes this claim: “I think one-third of my colleagues are either biologically unsuited to do their jobs, or if not are exceptions and should be suspected of such until they can prove otherwise to each and every person’s satisfaction.”?
Do you honestly, seriously believe this is what he said?
You also say this: “I need to be very clear here: not only was nearly everything you said in that document wrong…”
Which indicates that you haven’t looked at a single one of his sources.
Until you prove otherwise by retracting this ideological hack piece and apologising for it, you are nothing more than an intellectually bankrupt, pathetic, weasel.