Sitemap

PlainSignal vs Google Analytics

4 min readApr 15, 2025

When it comes to tracking marketing performance, most people default to Google Analytics. It’s free, powerful, and widely adopted. But as the digital landscape shifts toward privacy, clarity, and user-friendly tools, many marketers and founders are asking:

Is there a better way to understand where my signups and sales are coming from — without all the complexity and data bloat?

Enter PlainSignal — a privacy-focused analytics tool designed for clean, actionable campaign attribution.

PlainSignal vs Google Analytics
PlainSignal vs Google Analytics

In this post, we’ll break down how PlainSignal compares to Google Analytics (GA4), and help you decide which is the better fit for your needs.

🔍 TL;DR: Key Differences

Plainsignal vs Google Analytics Comparison Table
Google Analytics vs PlainSignal Comparison Table

1. Simplicity vs Power

  • Google Analytics offers everything under the sun — user flows, real-time events, segments, cohorts, and more.
  • PlainSignal narrows the focus to what matters most for growing products:
  • Where did the user come from?
  • Which campaign converted them?
  • Did they sign up or buy?

If you’re tired of navigating through 10 dashboards just to see what drove conversions, PlainSignal is refreshingly simple.

🔐 2. Privacy Focused vs Data Hungry

Google Analytics uses cookies, tracks IPs, and builds behavioral profiles. That raises red flags under GDPR, CCPA, and other privacy laws, often forcing you to show cookie banners or user consent forms.

PlainSignal, on the other hand:

  • Doesn’t use cookies or local storage
  • Doesn’t track personal data or user behavior across sites
  • Doesn’t require you to show a cookie banner

This makes it a safer choice for privacy-conscious brands — especially in regulated regions or industries.

📈 3. Attribution You Can Understand

Most people struggle to get clear attribution from GA4. Between sessions, conversions, event funnels, and last-click models, it’s easy to lose sight of what’s actually driving results.

PlainSignal is built specifically to answer:

  • Did utm_source=newsletter drive this signup?
  • Which referrer sent the most paid customers last week?
  • How are my affiliate partners performing?

No filters, no extra dashboards, no code gymnastics.

⚙️ 4. Setup Time: Minutes vs Hours

  • GA4 requires you to set up tags, conversions, custom events, and possibly a Google Tag Manager account.
  • PlainSignal works out of the box — drop in a script or pixel, and attribution starts flowing.

If you’re a solo founder, indie hacker, or small team, that’s the difference between launching today and spending a week fiddling with configs.

🎯 Who Should Use PlainSignal?

PlainSignal is perfect for:

  • SaaS startups and e-commerce stores focused on campaign ROI
  • Marketers who use UTM links, affiliates, or content marketing
  • Teams that value privacy compliance without extra effort
  • Anyone who finds GA4 overwhelming

⚡ 5. Web Vitals: Built-in Performance Insights

Most analytics platforms don’t help you understand how fast your site feels to real users — and yet performance directly affects both conversion rates and SEO.

✅ PlainSignal: Real Web Vitals, Filtered by Campaigns

PlainSignal includes first-party monitoring of:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)
  • FCP (First Contentful Paint)

And unlike Google Analytics, PlainSignal lets you:

  • Break down vitals by location, device type, browser
  • Analyze performance per UTM campaign, referrer, or traffic source
  • Track how performance trends over time for real visitors — not just synthetic lab data

This is incredibly useful for:

  • Identifying slow landing pages tied to a specific campaign
  • Comparing performance between paid vs organic traffic
  • Catching regressions for users in specific countries or on mobile

🚫 Google Analytics: No Built-in Web Vitals

GA4 does not track LCP, FCP, or other Core Web Vitals out of the box. You’d need to:

  • Manually set up custom event tracking
  • Use Google Search Console or external tools like Lighthouse or CrUX
  • Combine multiple dashboards to get an incomplete picture
PlainSignal vs Google Analytic Web Vitals

Final Thoughts on Performance Analytics

If you’re running high-traffic campaigns or optimizing for conversions, tracking Web Vitals per campaign or referral source can unlock valuable insights.

PlainSignal lets you:

  • See if a campaign led users to a slow page experience
  • Identify if visitors from Facebook in Brazil using Android are struggling
  • Prove performance improvements with real data over time

🧮 6. Script Size: Lightweight vs Bloated

When you’re optimizing for page speed, every kilobyte matters — especially on mobile or slower networks. The size of your analytics script can have a measurable impact on load times, Core Web Vitals, and bounce rates.

⚡ PlainSignal: Just 2 KB, Gzipped

The PlainSignal tracking snippet is:

  • 2 KB gzipped
  • Loads asynchronously
  • Doesn’t block rendering
  • Designed to be invisible to adblockers

This ensures it doesn’t add noticeable latency or hurt your performance scores.

🏋️ Google Analytics (GA4): 380+ KB Loaded

GA4’s full script stack, including gtag.js, can load up to 380 KB when expanded:

  • gtag.js loader
  • Multiple network requests
  • Delayed execution
  • Potential fingerprinting libraries (when extended with ad/remarketing support)
PlainSignal vs Google Analytics Script Size

While not all 380 KB is loaded immediately, its presence can impact Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and trigger privacy blockers.

Google Analytics leaves a gap here — and that’s where PlainSignal fills in, effortlessly.

--

--

PlainSignal
PlainSignal

Written by PlainSignal

📈 Google Analytics alternative 🚀 Intuitive & lightweight (~2 KB) 🛡️ Privacy-focused 🍪 No cookies & no need for GDPR, CCPA, PECR banners ♥️ Subscriber-funded

No responses yet