Reform of the United Nations

With the end of the cold war and the increasing tilt towards Cobden policies in the east mankind expected a reappraisal of all existing international institution in tune with the rhythm of modern requirement and new challenges rather than continue with the leadership of the second world war victorious party (The five permanent members of the security council). An egalitarian world led by a totalitarian institution like the United Nations Security Council is an open invitation to chaos as we are witnessing it today all over the world. The United Nations of our dream is that which have supreme powers of security over a world where all man are free. The U.N Security Council is autocratic with her veto wielding powers over U.N general Assembles decisions. That is why nations are very suspicious of her decisions as it affect them sometimes even well meaning decisions. If the United States had accepted the recommendations of the U.N not to wage war on Iraq over invisible (w.m.d.s) weapons of mas destruction the pogrom and bear-headings taking place in that part of our world probably would have been avoided. The U.S. war in Iraq was a war that could have been avoided if the U.N was in complete control of world security instead of third party role she presently play in world affairs, the war on Iraq was a war that brought the U.N charter to ridicule by setting dangerous precedents in altering her traditional peace-keeping role for what the security council call peace enforcement peace like the male love for a lady's love can’t be forced it happen naturally if its approach judiciously. The use of violence in pursuit of peace is a direct declaration of war on a people it is like the apostle Paul said in Romans 3: 8 we can’t say “Let us do evil that good may result” war which the organisation was formed to prevent, that is if the opening remarks of its Charter is reviewed accordingly, it says “We the people of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice have brought untold sorrow to mankind” … An organisation which claim peace as her goal cannot consider war a solution in conflict resolution as its constituted. Africa henceforth do not want to have anything to do with the present United Nation as its presently constituted.

Under a new United Nation no nation would maintain a Military as there is no rationale for keeping military that cannot wage war or kill a man, waging violent wars and killing of our kind (human) is what Military are trained to do conditions that are impracticable in a Cobden world (Kingdom of God). Arguing from human perspectives Homer in his famous classic poem made us understand “Bare steel in sight draws men to fights” military armaments have gone beyond being constructed of steel (sword) they now are manufactured with combinations of other material, some explosives are even now made with our food such as peanuts because they are made with peanuts those not mean we can eat from them when we are hungry dynamites from peanuts can cause more death and destruction to life and properties than any steel sword wielding Greek or Roman solder could have imagined. Like the steel swords wielding man modern man armaments must be destroyed to be removed from the sights of man “Out of sights they say is out of mind” so to speak.

The present state of the world security is aptly depicted by the Irish poet William Butler Yeats in the first two stanza of his three stanza poem he personally introduce as “A World of Fragments,” but Titled;

The Second Coming

‘’Turning and tuning in the widening gyre

the Falcon cannot hear the Falconer:

Things Fall Apart; the center cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is let loosed upon the world,

The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The best lack all conviction, while the worst

Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;

Surely the Second Coming is at hand.

The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out

When a vast image out of spiritus mundi

Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of the desert.

BY William Butler Yeats

The American writer Herbert Lieberman summed up the state of our world in one of his prose piece, in his word ‘’ Civilization as we know it is burning: The world lies in moral tatters pornography and degradation abound: Governments are run by moral pederasts, international laws or what passes for it is in shambles. All human institutions are in disarray. Anarchy and terror are everywhere. Shortly he said we would return to the conditions of the Pleistocene.’’

There is no international rule on morality it should be noted however that the facades mankind put up among their peers (man)those not make us righteous for our God look at the hearts of man unkempt beard and loused clothing (Fashion) does not make anyone righteous, everyone aught to be properly clad, to be properly clad is recommended not only for easy identification of the sexes but it dignified our personage, it is not righteousness but good sense mankind cannot all be clad alike (Uniformed) what then constitutes properly clad? How the individual desires to be seen or looked at and addressed, if an individual feel comfortable in his or her nudity in public places its shouldn't be of any concern to God or other persons if the laws permits it, it will be of concern to God and the law enforcement agency if the nude individual was forced by another person to go nude in public against the individuals will, like the African Saartjie Baartman was made to do in what the European call fashion show. Violence debauchery and the promiscuous propensity of a people those not define refinement. The scriptures is unequivocal in it disapproval's of Bestiality, Homosexuality, Transgender conducts and same sex marriages Review Romans 1: 24 to 27. Leviticus 18: 22 and 23, Leviticus 20: 13.

The Twenty First Century: is the age of Laissez-aller in human development. This was the reason for the directive “He shall tell you the truth, and the truth shall set you free” This directives was not referring to prison inmates all over the world, its was making references to the ignorance of mans world of the creator God and the consequence of mankind's enlightenment. The servant of God whom mankind were told to expect cannot resort to force of arms to make man abide by his instruction he has no force of arms. He is responsible for what he approves only, not for the idiosyncrasies of the people nor the exercise of individual liberty, except where there is a failure in leadership at such times the leadership shall be held responsible. See Ezekiel 33: 7 to 9. “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; so hear the word I speak and give them warning from me. When I say to the wicked, ‘O wicked man, you will surely die,’ and you do not speak out to dissuade him from his ways, that wicked man will die for his sin, and I will hold you accountable for his blood. But if you do warn the wicked man to turn from his ways and he does not do so, he will die for his sin, but you will have saved yourself.” See Romans 14: 22. “Blessed is the man who does not condemn himself by what he approves” “The soul that sin it shall die” “Everything is permissible-but not everything is beneficial. Everything is permissible”-but not everything is constructive”. 1st Corinthians 10: 23.

Still on United Nations Reforms: Failure of mankind to uphold justice in a United Nations Organization established to pursue justice for all Nations was what led God to carry out the U.N. reforms Himself as He informed mankind before hand in Isaiah 46: 9 and 10 ‘’We have a God who make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please” He applied the vision of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 2: 24 to 35, using an enormous human statue made with five elements to symbolize the Security Council’s five permanent members with five unrelated substance that can not mix when joined together, this are Gold, Silver, Bronze, Iron and Baked Clay. In its place shall be an egalitarian assembly of Abraham man with sovereign responsibilities.

Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream: Daniel 2: 28 to 45 ”There is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries. He has shown you what is going to happen in days to come. Your dream and the visions that passed through your mind as you lay on your bed are these: As you were lying there, O King, your mind turned to things to come, and the reveler of mysteries showed you what is going to happen. As for me, this mystery has been revealed to me, not because I have greater wisdom than other living men, but so that you, O King, may know the interpretation and that you may understand what went through your mind. You looked, O King, and there before you stood a large statue- an enormous, dazzling statue, awesome in appearance. The head of the statue was made of pure gold, its chest and arms of silver, its belly and thighs of bronze, its legs of iron, its feet partly of iron and partly of baked clay. While you were watching, a rock was cut out, but not by human hands. It struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and smashed them. Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were broken to pieces at the same time and became like chaff on a threshing floor in the summer. The wind swept them away without leaving a trace. But the rock that struck the statue became a huge mountain and filled the whole earth. This was the dream, and now we will interpret it to the the king”

Daniel Interprets Nebuchadnezzar Dream: Daniel 2: 37–45You, O King, you are the king of kings. The God of heaven has given you dominion and power and might and glory; in your hands he has placed mankind and the beasts of the field and the the birds of the air. Wherever they live, he has made you ruler over them all. You are that head of gold. After you, another kingdom will rise, inferior to yours. Next, a third kingdom, one of bronze, will rule over the whole earth. Finally, there will be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron- for iron breaks and smashes everything-and as iron breaks things to pieces, so it will crush and break all the others. Just as you saw that the feet and toes were partly of baked clay and partly of iron, so this will be a divided kingdom; yet it will have some of the strength of iron in it, even as you saw iron mixed with clay. So this kingdom will be partly strong and partly brittle. And just as you saw the iron mixed with baked clay, so the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixed with clay” “In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever. This is the meaning of the vision of the rock cut out of a mountain, but not by human hands- a rock that broke the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver and the gold to pieces. The great God has shown the king what will take place in the future. The dream is true and the interpretation is trustworthy”

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Mr. Charles U. Okeri is’s story.