I’m glad I read the comments below and found that other people have challenged the narrowness of your conclusions.
In other words, you are absolutely right about some really big ideas and principles, except for those instances where you disregard contradictory evidence, and assign motives, and cast aspersions that are undercut by the facts you leave out.
I won’t try to summarize them here, as it will take too long. I suggest that respondents scroll through the comments below. It won’t take long to catalog the errors in the arguments.