Krishna Pandey
Jul 30, 2017 · 2 min read

Decoding Kashmir Issue

I would have been agreed with your question until I met a real-life encounter. I have thought that it is one’s personal choice to do whatever one wants, I was not aware that one’s personal choice is valid until and unless that choice is not intriguing into the interest and matters of others.

In a village very lovey to me, lives a family, having 29 acres of land. The family is very rich and prosperous as they have the huge land of 29 acres. Also, to take care of these lands, owner has appointed some ‘small group of people’ to take care of one acre of land for each acre of the land.

The owner of the land is one who decides what to be sown and how to ultimately to crop. On occasions, one or two ‘small group of people’ agitate against the owner to have their own way of crop and even want to part away to the land owner ALONG WITH that one care of land which is originally and absolutely belongs to the owner. These people foolishly argue that they want to work on the field as per their wish. More tragically, a few people from other 28 small groups of people agree that that one should part away. Actually, the chemistry behind their support was to open a door to divide the whole 29 acres of land into many pieces and to vanish the glory of the land owner. However, land owner is very witty and he knows how to tackle with these people who wish to work against his wish on his own land. Time and again the owner neutralises those whoever have forcefully tried to sow the crop against his wish.

In the history of these 29 acres of land and its owner, there was a time when an owner (comparatively more powerful and united) of another village attacked at these 29 acres of land and eventually acquired them all. However, this owner along with all these 29 acres of land people defied the ruling of someone belonging to another village and finally won the battle to get back the possession over their land of 29 acres.

Now coming back to present time, the owner is very strong and cannot tolerate anyone going against rule of law of the farming in his fields let alone parting away of the land from him. Owner knows that, if this fragile one acre of land part away (which seems not possible) from him, some selfish people from other 28 acres of land will start tuning voice to claim their sole right over the land they are working.

It is very naïve with mischievous intention of some people when they compare current scenario with that of the past. These very few people forgot that in the past there was an external attack by another village land owner however in current scenario it is our own internal matter which can and will only be decided by the owner of these 29 acres of lands.

Analogies: (Readers are smart enough)

:D

Krishna Pandey

Written by

Cricket enthusiast. content writing.I recon India as next super power and Vishwa guru. Retweets are endorsements.