I posted my take on the “inevitable” Brexit end-game early-December last year, and so far it’s still going exactly to plan (aka the “cunning plan”) as far as I can see. The enormous defeat of May’s deal in the house is the defeat intended. Put simply, the best Brexit deal isn’t acceptable to anyone of any party-political colour or EU sentiment. May’s efforts have successfully proven this beyond doubt. The bigger the margin the clearer that is — not even any (many?) abstentions.
So what is the cunning plan? Parliament (only) to take action:
- Suspend or temporarily revoke Article 50 for (say) 3 to 5 years. (To give us all cross-party space for anything else we need to do.)
- Create a standing Constitutional (aka peoples) Assembly (CA) to take load off parliament.
- Allow parliament and government to focus on ongoing non-Brexit operational policy priorities. Health, Education, Eco-sustainability, Foreign policy, upcoming EU elections (!), etc. Business as usual.
- Brief for CA.
- Evolve it’s own constitution, processes and funding (voluntary service initially, mix of appointment & election, civil-services expenses) BUT key constraint is that however it functions / delegates / researches / debates, it can only recommend proposed plans to parliament — via normal party, committee, lobby processes — but “worked out” in sufficient detail and consensus in advance by the CA. CA has zero executive or legislative voting powers.
- Priority issues to address. “Proper-PR” electoral and government constitutional arrangements at all local, regional, national and international levels including EU relationship reforms not limited to all possible Brexit options, additional referenda (god-forbid) , whatever.
- EU / Brexit recommendations must be delivered to parliament in time for end of A50 suspension.
Take it away. You’re welcome.
Originally published at Psybertron Asks.