Not ‘within the context of the conversation.’ So is there one, or do you have to reach to other interactions to imagine one? Such a stance requires the belief that all interactions were forever tainted. It amounts to the argument that Trump is holding a gun to the head of anyone he can fire.
Again, you are incorrect. Comey declared that Trump was never under investigation which was reported by a very large number of outlets. Every major one outside of the Wall Street Journal from what I can tell.
You missed my point obviously. He could of course believe the Comey let Clinton off and breached protocol to do so. That’s perfectly consistent.