Not ‘within the context of the conversation.’
S Pinch
1

Within the context of the conversation Harris is referring to his job never came up, as I said. There is no pressure, no gun to his head. You draw on a past conversation to invent a context to this one.

Don’t get mad at me that you’re uninformed, but your formulation is quite humorous. I claimed Comey contradicted a large number reports claiming Trump was being investigated. You claim he only rebutted one. I explained how his comment shows a host are false, thus undermining her claim. You say I’m conflating… Harris’s line of question was an absolute joke, it had no basis in reality.

https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/872873102690185216

Yes Sessions signed off on a report explaining why Comey should be fired for not following proper protocol. That’s my point exactly, nothing shows Sessions acted due to Russian probe.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.