On the Importance of Subjective and Objective Measures

Gianluca Truda
Aug 12, 2018 · 3 min read
Image for post
Image for post

Subjective metrics (e.g. happiness) alone aren’t very consistent or reliable data points. Objective metrics (e.g. distance run) are great for statistical analysis but don’t yet exist for many of the things we care about. To get around that, we use markers or proxies of the things we care about. I argue that a combination of subjective and objective metrics is a powerful tool in gaining insights.


Here’s an example:

The latest version of my personal tracking framework has around 40 data points for both Subjective Productivity Rating (SPR) and for Deep Work hours.

SPR is a measure of how productive my day was with reference to the things most important to my life and career, on an integer scale of 1–5.

Deep Work hours are a related objective metric, simply measured by how many hours I logged in my retrospective calendar as being spent in a state of Deep Work. This is really only a proxy for how productive I’ve been, as my hours in this focused state are not always equally intense, so an hour of Deep Work is of varying impact.

On their own, neither is a very good indicator of how productive I’ve really been. SPR is subject to bias, flawed perceptions and the inherent noisiness of quantifying a psychological experience, whilst Deep Work hours are only a reference point for how productive I was. Both are great things to track individually, but together they allow me to get a sense of:

  1. How productive I perceive my time spent working to be.

Looking at the data

Image for post
Image for post
SPR vs Deep Work (h) for 40 days

As you can see (from the limited data I’ve gathered in this new framework), hours spent in Deep Work on any given day (X-axis) and SPR for a given day (Y-axis) only correlate with R² ≈ 0.41 on a linear fit. This isn’t very high, but visual inspection of the graph reveals more insights.

Days of fewer than 2 hours in deep work have SPR values ranging from 2–5 in a clustering pattern. Then there is a huge gap in the data from 2 to 4 hours. I clearly get into a flow state after 2 hours of work and then just keep going for 4+ hours. On the upper end, when I’ve spent 4+ hours in a Deep Work state, my subjective experience is always one of high productivity – most values are 5/5.

Takeaways

  • Spending more time in a state of Deep Work makes me perceive myself as having been more productive. It also makes my perceived productivity more consistent. This could be due to the fact that I’m actually more productive, or merely a subjective experience of being more productivity.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch

Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore

Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store