What are you claiming? And are you saying you are opposed to sustainable development?
Development that is not sustainable is unsustainable by definition. In the long run it is literally impossible to avoid transitioning to either sustainable development, to no development, or to whatever the opposite of development is.
You were responding to my statement that “certain studies such as Verheggen 2014 kept the responses from climate scientists anonymous, the majority had no cause to hide their true opinions.” Your response doesn’t speak to that at all.
Voters need to understand that it’s up to them to fix this. The problem stems from virtually every congressional campaign getting more than half its money from people donating over $200, and many a great many relying mostly on maxed-out contributions. That’s before you count SuperPACs and dark money. Sure the Republicans are worse in the plutocracy…