I am in full agreement with you.
Shane Greenup
673

Want to engage at more length, but for now, what about the fact that Google’s search algorithms (which as others have pointed out, are not neutral) are being gamed to bring up false results?

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/04/google-democracy-truth-internet-search-facebook

(From December, so some of this may have been — fingers crossed! — fixed by now:

“A few days later, I talk to Danny Sullivan, the founding editor of SearchEngineLand.com. He’s been recommended to me by several academics as one of the most knowledgeable experts on search. Am I just being naive, I ask him? Should I have known this was out there? “No, you’re not being naive,” he says. “This is awful. It’s horrible. It’s the equivalent of going into a library and asking a librarian about Judaism and being handed 10 books of hate. Google is doing a horrible, horrible job of delivering answers here. It can and should do better.”

He’s surprised too. “I thought they stopped offering autocomplete suggestions for religions in 2011.” And then he types “are women” into his own computer. “Good lord! That answer at the top. It’s a featured result. It’s called a “direct answer”. This is supposed to be indisputable. It’s Google’s highest endorsement.” That every women has some degree of prostitute in her? “Yes. This is Google’s algorithm going terribly wrong.”

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.