Thanks for your response! Reading these papers (and related literature) now.
I felt sorry for not linking to the follow-ups by Scott and for not Storify-ing your discussion on Twitter (but hoped that those interested enough will find them in the updates to the original review).
To make this clear: I still liked your book and regularly recommend it, I just wasn’t entirely convinced by it (which probably wasn’t possible anyway, since it is more like an introduction into the underexplored area). Looking forward to reading more from you!