Morons for opposing your racist, classist, nativist candidate?

Liberal apologists are whipping themselves into a fury that their vile candidate is frequently held in the same regard as the GOP troglodyte that is her “supposed opposition.” A more recent unhinged tirade is a blog post entitled “The Moron’s Case For Hillary Clinton…because some of you really are that stupid.”

I doubt my comments will make it past moderation, but I wrote the following in response to their insulting screed:

Racist bigot Donald Trump only talks about “Building a wall across the southern border that Mexico.” Meanwhile bigoted nativist Hillary Rodham Clinton has voted for walls on our southwest border, and supported some of the most draconian immigration policies in history: No Friend of Immigrants.

In Clinton we have an individual so bellicose, so prone to fetishizing violence, and so willing to mete out death and destruction, that they’ve garnered the endorsement of some of the world’s most notorious war criminals. Clinton is endorsed by Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright, and John Negroponte, butchers all. In a just world the four of them would be frog-marched in shackles to the dock at The Hague.

Perhaps right-of-center shills feel comfortable asserting Clinton’s vile actions are “public service”, but the left cannot ignore your candidate’s murderous record in Haiti, Honduras, Iraq, Libya, Palestine, and Syria.

We’re not morons, we’re just incapable of voting for evil of her magnitude. As the esteemed Professor Professor Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor says: “Clinton will never be a lesser evil.”

Feel free, however, to continue insulting everyone that sees your racist, classist, nativist candidate for what she is. I’m sure if you call us morons frequently enough, we’ll vote against our own interests?

Never Clinton. Never Trump.

Like what you read? Give Robert D Skeels rdsathene a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.