Crafting a Comprehensive Literature Review: The Art of Intertextual Coherence and Problematization

Introduction

Storytelling is an intricate craft, and the author’s position in relation to the existing literature plays a pivotal role in weaving a compelling narrative. In the realm of academia and research, the presentation of literature is a delicate art, involving two distinct yet interrelated processes: constructing intertextual coherence and problematizing the situation. These processes shape the way knowledge is organized, conveyed, and understood in the vast tapestry of human understanding. In this essay, we will delve into the significance of these processes and explore the techniques that authors employ to construct intertextual coherence and problematize existing literature.

Constructing Intertextual Coherence

1. Synthesized Coherence: Synthesized coherence involves the art of connecting seemingly unrelated ideas or research findings, much like fitting puzzle pieces together to create a harmonious picture. It’s akin to discovering hidden connections between topics that were once thought to have no relationship. Imagine a jigsaw puzzle where pieces from different sets merge seamlessly, forming a more comprehensive and intriguing whole. Authors who employ synthesized coherence are like intellectual detectives, revealing the beauty of the previously unseen connections in the literary landscape.
2. Progressive Coherence: In the context of progressive coherence, authors build upon a body of knowledge where there is a substantial consensus. This is akin to steadily adding pieces to a puzzle until an entire section is complete. It is a collaborative process, where scholars contribute to an existing understanding, expanding and solidifying the foundations of a particular field. The resulting coherence reflects a shared vision and an evolving, collective wisdom.
3. Non-Coherence: Non-coherence, in contrast, acknowledges that while many contributions exist within a specific research domain, considerable disagreement prevails among practitioners regarding their alignment and relevance. This approach recognizes that diverse perspectives may coexist within the literature, allowing room for fresh insights and alternative interpretations. It portrays the existing literature as open to critique and invites contributions that challenge established norms and theories.

Problematizing the Situation

1. Incomplete Problematization: Incomplete problematization identifies gaps or missing pieces in the existing literature. It’s akin to recognizing that the puzzle is missing crucial elements. For instance, if there’s extensive research on the impact of climate change in urban areas but a dearth of information on its consequences in rural settings, an incomplete problematization prompts scholars to seek answers in the overlooked spaces.
2. Inadequate Problematization: Inadequate problematization reveals that the current literature has overlooked valuable perspectives or frameworks that could enhance our understanding of a subject. It introduces alternative viewpoints or ideas to enrich the existing discourse. Imagine a puzzle where some pieces have been placed incorrectly, and rearranging them uncovers a more comprehensive and accurate image.
3. Incommensurate Problematization: Incommensurate problematization goes further, asserting that the existing literature is not merely incomplete or inadequate but fundamentally flawed or misguided. This approach offers an alternative perspective that challenges the established body of work. It argues that there is a superior way to interpret or approach a particular topic, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and discourse. It’s like suggesting that the puzzle everyone has been solving is entirely wrong, and a new puzzle must be assembled.

Conclusion

The art of storytelling in literature extends beyond the narratives in books and novels. In the realm of research, the author’s ability to construct intertextual coherence and problematize existing literature is central to shaping our collective understanding of the world. These techniques allow scholars to synthesize, progress, and challenge established knowledge, ensuring that the puzzle of human knowledge remains a dynamic and ever-evolving masterpiece. Whether creating harmony from disparate elements or unraveling conventional wisdom, these processes add depth and richness to the narrative of human progress.