Neat, Plausible, and Generally Wrong: A Response to the CDC Recommendations for Chronic Opioid Use
Stephen Martin, MD, EdM
3777

Dear Dr Martin, Potee, and Lazris,

Thank you for a deeply researched and referenced analysis of the recent CDC guidelines on opioids. If I may add at the margins to your devastating critique, I commend for your reading “Tracking Down the ‘Research’ Behind the CDC’s Opioid Prescribing Guidelines”. See http://nationalpainreport.com/tracking-down-the-research-behind-the-cdcs-opioid-prescribing-guidelines-8831122.html.

As I noted in that article, “ A strong case can be made that the basic research used by the CDC to justify restrictive guidelines on prescription of opioids is not only scientifically weak but has been cherry-picked by a group of people who were NOT qualified in pain management, to support a totally fraudulent guideline.”

Thanks again for your insightful debunking of the CDC nonsense. It is imperative that the March guidelines be withdrawn for a total rewrite. I echo Lana Kirby’s invitation to join a rally of chronic pain patients to make their case in close proximity to the White House.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.