How the anthropic principle became the most abused idea in science
Ethan Siegel

Generally agreed on just about all points made here, although aside from Barrow and Tipler, I have rarely run across these bad interpretations of the anthropic principle inside scientific circles.

“People claim that the anthropic principle supports a multiverse”

I haven’t heard people claim this so I wonder if it might be a straw man. The claim I have heard (which I would agree with) is that if it’s difficult to get inflation to happen without it being eternal, then we should take the idea of a multiverse very seriously — possibly even considering it a generic prediction of inflation. And if we combine that with anthropic considerations, then we get a very nice satisfying explanation of the measured value of the cosmological constant.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.