Can teaching media literacy really backfire? A librarian ponders the scary argument
Aaron Tay

Thanks for this fine post, Aaron. I also had my qualms about boyd’s decision to blame media literacy for the fine state of affairs of hyper-partisanship and polarization. It seems that she is wondering about whether or not people are really up for the challenge of reasoning and weighing evidence, given our built-in predilection to trust lived experience over second- or third-hand stuff handed to us. Of course, not everyone will be equally skilled at handling the ambiguity and epistemological uncertainty that is part of the process of interpreting information: some just want to see the world in black and white. But learning to see and love the greys is what education is all about. Her concerns remind me a bit of the Lippmann — Dewey debate from the 1920s. Perhaps people really do need thought leaders — experts — to “give” us opinions and manufacture consent. And perhaps people also have to exercise the capacity to use reasoning and evidence to come to their own conclusions, learning how to be truly a citizen of a democratic society. Or perhaps neither extreme is realistic or possible. People have been debating this issues since the Enlightenment.

I think the best thing that’s come out of the information literacy community has been the framework helping people see how authority is constructed and contextual, and I don’t think that concept is very widely understood or appreciated, yet. We have a lot of work to do. Thanks for adding your two cents to the discussion.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.