Hallucination in Large Language Models and Two Effective Alleviation Pathways
An Introduction to Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Knowledge Graph
Author
- Qingqin Fang (ORCID: 0009–0003–5348–4264)
Introduction
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the landscape of natural language processing, demonstrating exceptional proficiency in generating text that closely resembles human language. However, a significant challenge faced by these advanced models is the phenomenon known as “hallucination.” Hallucination in LLMs refers to the generation of content that appears factual but lacks a basis in reality. This issue poses a critical obstacle to the safe deployment of LLMs in real-world applications, where accuracy and reliability are paramount.
In this post, we’ll embark on a journey to understand hallucination, its causes and two effective mitigation techniques: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Knowledge Graph (KG) integration, including the classification and evolution. By combining these strategies, we aim to counter hallucination challenges and contribute to the responsible development of LLMs.
What is Hallucination?
Hallucination in LLMs occurs when the model generates information that is factually incorrect or entirely fabricated. This phenomenon stems from the training phase of the model, where the LLM has been exposed to vast amounts of online text data. While this extensive training data enables LLMs to exhibit impressive language fluency, it also opens the door to potential pitfalls.
The generation of hallucinations in LLMs can be attributed to several factors:
1. Biases in Training Data: LLMs learn from the data they are trained on, which may contain biases or inaccuracies. These biases can influence the model’s output, leading to the generation of hallucinated content.
2. Ambiguity in Prompts: LLMs rely on prompts to generate text. Ambiguous or unclear prompts can result in the model extrapolating information incorrectly, leading to hallucinations in the generated text.
3. Lack of Comprehension: Despite their language generation capabilities, LLMs may lack true comprehension of the content they generate. This can result in the model modifying information to superficially align with the input, even if it is factually incorrect.
Hallucination Mitigation
Prompt engineering is the crafting of instructions for Artificial Intelligence (AI) text generation models, adjusting the parameters of a sophisticated tool to achieve optimal results, ensuring more refined and tailored content, resulting in more accurate and reliable outputs.
Some studies have focused on developing innovative models to address hallucinations, emphasising a continuous and progressive process that combines algorithmic advancements and improvements in data quality. Instead of fine-tuning models, these methods implement a comprehensive model architecture to combat hallucinations.
In this post, we delve into two effective mitigation strategies — Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Knowledge Graph (KG) integration — to address hallucination challenges in LLMs.
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) in LLM
RAG is a technique used to enhance the responses of LLMs by incorporating external, authoritative knowledge bases during the text generation process. By tapping into external sources of information, RAG provides additional context and verifiable data to guide the generation of text, ultimately improving the accuracy and reliability of the generated content.
RAG Categories Based on its Implementation:
1. Before Generation: Techniques involving information retrieval before text generation, like LLM-Augmenter.
2. During Generation: Methods utilising external knowledge retrieval mechanisms during text generation, such as Knowledge Retrieval and Decompose-and-Query framework.
3. After Generation: Approaches focusing on post-generation verification and refinement, like RARR and High Entropy Word Spotting and Replacement.
4. End-to-End: Holistic integration of retrieval mechanisms throughout the entire text generation process, exemplified by RAG.
By categorising RAG into these subcategories, researchers and developers can better understand the diverse applications and methodologies of retrieval augmented generation in mitigating hallucination in LLMs.
The Evolution of RAG Paradigms
1. Naive RAG: Initial approach following a “Retrieve-Read” methodology, cost-effective but with limitations.
2. Advanced RAG: Introduced sophisticated elements like query rewriting and chunk reranking to enhance LLM performance.
3. Modular RAG: Further refinement with new modules like Search and Memory Modules to improve retrieval accuracy.
One interesting aspect of the evolution from Naive RAG to Advanced RAG and Modular RAG, signifying significant progress in the field. Naive RAG, initially adopted after ChatGPT, followed a traditional “Retrieve-Read” approach but had limitations despite being cost-effective. Advanced RAG introduced advanced elements like query rewriting and chunk reranking, enhancing LLM performance. Modular RAG further improved this by adding modules like Search and Memory Modules for better retrieval accuracy.
This progression addressed the limitations of Naive RAG by integrating more advanced technologies. Advanced RAG and Modular RAG aimed to optimise retrieval-augmented generation systems through complex architectures and new modules. The integration of RAG with fine-tuning, a notable technique, combines retrieval-based methods and fine-tuning to enhance RAG model performance effectively. By exploring optimal integration strategies like sequential or joint training, this hybrid approach shows promise in enhancing LLMs through a blend of retrieval and fine-tuning methods.
While RAG is a cutting-edge technology with growth potential, it still faces challenges. Improving user-friendliness, query understanding, data compatibility, and evaluation methods are key areas for development. Ongoing research is crucial to unlock RAG’s full potential and shape its future in language models and generative tasks, leveraging its strengths in integrating retrieval and fine-tuning methods.
Knowledge Graph in LLM
A Knowledge Graph (KG) is an organised collection of data that represents entities, their attributes, and the relationships between them in a structured format. KGs enable machines to understand the semantic meaning and connections within the data, facilitating sophisticated reasoning, data analysis, and information retrieval. Integrating KGs into LLMs involves incorporating external knowledge sources into the pre-training and inference stages of the models. This integration aims to enhance the understanding of acquired knowledge by LLMs, enabling them to generate more informed and contextually accurate responses.
Knowledge Graph Categories Based on its Implementation:
1. KG-enhanced LLMs: This framework focuses on integrating KGs into LLMs to enhance knowledge understanding during pre-training and inference. By leveraging external knowledge, this approach aims to improve LLM performance and interpretability.
2. LLM-augmented KGs: In this framework, LLMs are utilised for various KG tasks such as embedding, completion, construction, text generation, and question answering. The emphasis is on using LLMs to enhance KG-related tasks by incorporating textual information and improving downstream task performance.
3. Synergized LLMs + KGs: This framework emphasises a collaborative partnership between LLMs and KGs, enabling bidirectional reasoning through data and knowledge exchange. By leveraging the strengths of both models, this approach aims to enhance the capabilities of LLMs and KGs in a mutually beneficial manner.
The frameworks, including KG-enhanced LLMs, LLM-augmented KGs, and Synergized LLMs + KGs, emphasise the importance of integrating external knowledge sources into LLMs to enhance knowledge understanding, interpretability, and task performance. This structured approach facilitates bidirectional reasoning, data exchange, and collaborative utilisation of data and knowledge, leading to more informed and contextually accurate responses generated by LLMs.
Overall, the integration of KGs into LLMs not only enhances model performance but also broadens the scope of applications in natural language processing tasks. By leveraging external knowledge sources, LLMs can access a wealth of information, improve response accuracy, and provide more contextually relevant outputs, ultimately advancing the field of computational linguistics and contributing to the development of more sophisticated language models.
Conclusion
Addressing hallucination mitigation in LLMs involves navigating a complex challenge through a range of creative methodologies. Looking ahead, a crucial direction lies in countering hallucinations through the integration of multiple mitigation strategies, specifically by combining RAG and Knowledge Graph (KG). Furthermore, diminishing reliance on labelled data and exploring unsupervised or weakly supervised learning methods could contribute to enhanced scalability and adaptability.
By adeptly leveraging these techniques, LLMs hold the potential to produce text that is not only more reliable but also contextually relevant and factually accurate. This advancement is pivotal for the field of natural language processing, ensuring responsible AI development and fostering a more profound understanding of language nuances.
As we chart the course forward, ongoing research remains paramount. Continued exploration into the intricacies of combining RAG and KG, improving user-friendliness, refining query understanding, accommodating various data types, and establishing robust evaluation methods will be instrumental. The collaborative efforts of researchers and developers are key to unlocking the full potential of these approaches and shaping the future landscape of language models and generative tasks.
References
- Tonmoy, S. M. T. I., Zaman, S., Jain, V., Rani, A., Rawte, V., Chadha, A., & Das, A. (2024c). A comprehensive survey of hallucination mitigation techniques in large language models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2401.01313
- Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Yi, D., Sun, J., & Wang, H. (2023). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A survey. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997
- Pan, S., Luo, L., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Wang, J., & Wu, X. (2023). Unifying large language models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.08302
