You’re the fact checker now
Stanford Alumni

I think Prof Wineburg needs to recommend also how to deal with the NYT “narrative”:
 “…By and large, talented reporters scrambled to match stories with what internally was often called “the narrative.” We were occasionally asked to map a narrative for our various beats a year in advance, square the plan with editors, then generate stories that fit the pre-designated line.”

Today I am finding only Reuters and WSJ are quite level in the stories they present. Everyone else seems to be going for sensationalism and click-baiting.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.