Wait a second, didn’t NASA release a study showing that there is a net “GAIN” of ice in the…
Louis Weeks

is that how you reach your conclusions? finding articles that look like they support your delusions and then cherry picking quotes before rambling nonsense for three paragraphs?

here’s the text around your out-of-context reading:

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
“We’re essentially in agreement with other studies that show an increase in ice discharge in the Antarctic Peninsula and the Thwaites and Pine Island region of West Antarctica,” said Jay Zwally, a glaciologist with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author of the study, which was published on Oct. 30 in the Journal of Glaciology. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica — there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.” Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas.”
One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.