Jul 22, 2017 · 1 min read
Have you considered that online debate is probably not your true desire?
It seems as though the primary takeaway is that you require evidence merely to consider engaging in discussion. Unrealistic.
Assuming the intent of discussion is actually resolve, the next logical step probably involves committing to a mutual agreement of what constitutes “evidence”. Daunting.
And finally… Evaluating the impact of said evidence relating to the determination of unethical/criminal behavior. Futile.
The fact is there’s a tremendous amount of Trump-related, suspicious behavior that has warranted active investigations by the FBI, senate/house intelligence committees, senate judiciary committee and special counsel.
