The Equal Protection argument against “winner take all” in the Electoral College

How granular would this need to be? Would winner take all on a per-county basis be fine-grained enough to avoid voter disenfranchisement, or would you have to proportionally allocate electors for the entire state based solely on the number of votes per candidate?

As long as we’re talking about election mechanisms, it’s probably worth pointing out that voting systems like Single Transferable Vote (STV) are arguably fairer than the voting system we have now. Americans are allowed to cast a single vote for a single candidate; STV allows your vote to transfer to a second or third choice if it becomes clear that your first-choice vote is going to be wasted on a candidate that will not win.

Like what you read? Give Robert Harvey a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.