Super-emasculated men and autogynephilia
Over the last few decades, particularly in schools and academia, strong masculine role models have been suppressed in favour of emasculated ones. This, today, has led to a situation where the majority of teachers, outside the hard sciences, engineering and maths, are either women or emasculated, effete men.
When I returned to university in 2010 to complete my Master’s I was shocked to see the extent to which this corrosion had progressed — and that was in Scotland. Not only were a majority of teachers either women or emasculated males, the few remaining masculine males were marginalised. There were, literally, no straight male role models. (I became one.)
In other parts of the world, this is a hundred times worse. It is obvious that academia in the US and, increasingly, elsewhere, has been infected by an anti-male social cancer which insists that everything male is bad and everything female is not just better, but so much better that maleness itself must be destroyed.
One result of this is that we see far more males appearing as autogynephilic transvestites. While Blanchard related the classic autogynephile to the closeted, narcissistic cross-dresser who puts on feminine clothes to masturbate, this modern type is most closely related to the super-emasculated beta-male who first began to appear 20 years ago in ‘emo’ culture.
These men’s desire for emasculation has been stimulated by a culture that hates maleness. This culture has oozed out of institutions of learning and has infected business, government and industry, no more so than in the soft technologies of social media, where men are reviled and emasculated beta-males are vaunted. It has leached into politics, where masculine men are detested — just look at the reaction Donald Trump has suffered from its adherents. They are not particularly troubled about his policies, but by the fact that he is an alpha-male who is proud to be masculine and rejects the emasculation of Political Correctness and Identity Politics.
This is also why there are now so many females ‘transitioning’ into men: if being male is no longer a requirement to be a man, (as ‘gender theory’ teaches) but masculinity is still seen as a badge of social dominance (as ‘Political Correctness’ does), the logical conclusion is that females should become masculine to assert authority. This creates an ersatz form of matriarchy, a bastardised succubus that totally disregards the huge amounts of evidence we have of how true matriarchies work. In those, men are revered as brothers, sons, fathers and lovers, while women are revered as sisters, daughters, mothers and lovers. Men are loved in matriarchies, not hated.
In the ersatz matriarchy of Political Correctness, all things male must be emasculated and the patriarchal roles of men assumed by females. In other words, the patriarchy has simply colonised women, femaleness and femininity. The more they shout about ‘ending the patriarchy’, the more they are its creatures. Now women dance to its tune, acting out the regressive, hierarchical roles that once were played by men. It must laugh at how successful it has been, in once again duping humanity.
Just look at the Left’s counter to Donald Trump in last year’s US Presidential Election. A person born female who had fully adopted a masculine role, to the point that we might reasonably call her a ‘transman’. And consider the President that Trump will replace: the antithesis of masculinity, a weak, cavilling fool who pandered to the worst in the society that he ‘represented’ to the point that his party, the ‘Democrats’ might never see power again — one should hope.
In that election result we saw the first real challenge to the ghastly culture of feminazis and their emasculated beta-male poodles, the first strike back against the culture of male-hatred.
The consequence of this culture is on one hand, to see females adopting male roles and being every bit as unpleasant as men can be — how easily some gender roles are copied — and on the other, males becoming so traumatised by the constant derision of their masculinity that they ‘fall in love’ with the idea of being women. These are beta-males par excellence, the symbol of the eradication of masculinity; for if the regressive-left feminazis cannot kill all male babies — which they would do if they could — what better than to turn them into facsimiles of women?
I suppose one must even have sympathy with the sad products of this diseased culture, the men-become-women who are still rejected by the women they desire. ‘Look,’ they say, ‘We destroyed our masculinity to supplicate you! Why then will you not be our lovers?’ The absurdity of such a person becoming totally emasculated in order to so delight women that they would allow him to fuck them is positively hilarious — or would be were it not so tragic.
No transsexual (Blanchard HSTS) is confused in this way. She does not desire to emasculate anyone. She loves masculinity, delights in it, adores hairy chests, big muscles, strong men and being fucked. It is her raison d’etre, the deep-seated powerhouse that drives her life: her sheer adoration of and lust for masculinity. She can never be masculine herself but loving men, indeed, that is well within her gift. To her, the autogynephile, with his fake femininity and desire, nevertheless, for sex with women, is pathetic.
Of course, autogynephiles and transmasculine feminazis — the opposite sides of the same ghastly coin — know this and that is why they attempt, at every turn, to erase transsexuals. Consider: if my enemy’s friend is, by definition, my enemy, then what is my enemy’s lover? She who will wait on him, pursue sex with him, clean house for him and be the best of lovers, giving her body unreservedly to him? She who will nurse his wounds and soothe his hurts? Who will fall asleep in his arms, happy in the protection and security that her man gives her?
The hatred of feminazis and autogynephilic transvestites knows no bounds. Why? Because transsexuals are the very women that feminazis wish did not exist. They take every ‘gender stereotype’ and wear it like a badge of honour. And every autogynephile, no matter where he comes from, knows this reality: he can never compete with a transsexual. If one appears in the same room as he, the laughable pretence of his pseodo-femininity is at once exposed for the tissue of lies that it is.
These are the real reasons why emasculated autogynephiles and the harpies of supremacist feminazism hate transsexuals. They desire to erase them and those men who love them. They desire a world without men, women who love men and most of all, males who become women in order to love the Enemy — the powerful, dominant alpha male.
‘Gender Neutral’ Parenting
To this end they advocate ‘gender neutral’ parenting — in other words, the deliberate mental abuse of children in order to satisfy their supremacist anti-masculine agenda. How is punishing a male child for acting like a boy more acceptable than it would be to punish him for being a girl? The sheer hypocrisy of these people sticks in any right-thinking person’s craw.
Hell, they even loathe gays like Milo Yiannopoulous — why? Because he loves real men. The very men they loathe and have spent so many years plotting to destroy.
Well, I have news. Last November we struck a blow. It was a battle; we won it. Now we must win the war. To do so we need, now, to capitalise on the disarray of the feminazi and race-supremacist Left.
Gender pay gap myth
There is no ‘gender pay gap’. The ‘race pay gap’ is a myth. There is no ‘institutionalised racism’. A coloured person today finds it easier to go to college or find work than a better-qualified white person. Everyone has the vote and is equal under the law. In marital law, women are favoured over men. Everyone’s life is equally valid. There are no white slave-owners and we the descendants are not responsible for the sins of people who died a century and a half ago. There are no ‘reparations’ to pay. Egalitarianism is over; its ends have been achieved.
Today, the only slave-owners are those who have long profited from this ghastly trade and whose evil creed legitimises it — Muslims. They currently hold at least 23 million black people as slaves — 46 times as many as were held in the southern states of the US at the outbreak of the Civil War. 46 times as many.
There is no ‘rape culture’ in the West; rape culture, today, is a function of Islam. It is the principal means by which that cult maintains social control. This we see in the wave of Muslim rape-terrorism sweeping Europe today.
White male privilege is a chimera
There is no such thing as ‘white male privilege’. It is a chimera invented by the Regressive Left to attempt to emasculate that which they hate most — white men. They can no longer hide behind the mask of egalitarianism and have been exposed for what they are — supremacists who hate straight white men and the women who love them.
The only enemies of freedom of speech in the West today are the feminazis and race-supremacists of the Regressive Left. They know that silencing dissent is the keystone in their arch of darkness. In a chilling Orwellian fantasy, thoughts themselves are policed; voicing a legitimate opinion about ‘oppressed’ people — those who bask most unashamedly in their false, assumed, victim status — will get you a visit from the agents of the state, even in such ‘bastions of free speech’ as the UK.
Lies are the core of the Regressive Left’s assault on humanity, but we have struck a blow for freedom. The war, my dears, has only just begun.
Originally published at Rod Fleming’s World.