Your belief in free will is dangerous
James Roy Poulter

Frankly, you’re not defining or arguing anything here. You’re simply making unproven assertions which you back up with more unproven assertions.

Essentially, your “argument” is this: There is no free will. Why? Because if there were, you would be able to choose. But since you can’t choose, there is no free will.

I had intended to write more, but decided against it. Whether you believe in free will or not, I will be exercising mine.

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated Roger J Carlson’s story.