Your obvious bias against Facebook and corporations makes your article totally meaningless. I bet at the same time you trash Zuckerberg, you have Facdebook and Instagram account you use to promote your opinions.
I get it. You like Sanders and especially Warren’s view of big corporate as bad. You want Facebook to police what comments are good and what are bad (as a side note, have no clue how Dorsey is going to define what is “political” and what is not).
Unless Pete makes himself in the image of Sanders and Warren, he must be “bad”. Because of course, given the current political in environment, you’re either for me or against me, there are no shades of grey.
It would be valid for you to discuss Pete’s policy positions and why you prefer Sanders or Warren over each one. You could also say you prefer Sander’s/Warren’s position on fundraising over Pete’s. To totally trash the person because you think he’s tide to your emotional challenge with corporations is as dysfunctional as what the Trumpers do.