Aug 9, 2017 · 1 min read
Hell yes and thank you.
James’s understanding of the science of gender is right on (https://archive.is/VlNfl). The conclusions he drew from that science are mostly wrong or questionable (the differences between men and women make for differently amazing engineers, IMHO). He is 100% correct that it is impossibly risky to rationally discuss these topics at Google (or in academia) because they represent an orthodoxy that is maintained with near/actual violence.
Aptly demonstrated by the response to his paper. QED.