Aug 9, 2017 · 1 min read
If you really were a capable engineer, wouldn’t you have actually responded to what he wrote?
(Hint: there was nothing about penises)
Can you SHOW how he was wrong with any of his central thesis?
If not, why not?
If you really were a capable engineer, wouldn’t you have actually responded to what he wrote?
(Hint: there was nothing about penises)
Can you SHOW how he was wrong with any of his central thesis?
If not, why not?