Ryder Spearmann
Aug 27, 2017 · 2 min read

So how can you be defining a polar opposite of your argument by a group of people you can’t identify… by their character or their actions?

That’s the insanity of it. A perfect example of going off half-cocked.

I think you’ve picked up a scent of some sort, and you want to chase it down. It’s a distraction.

To the extent that the “alt-right” even exists, I can’t tell you much about them, or that I even care. I think the term was invented recently, and I doubt it even has anything resembling a clear definition. If by it you mean the Klan, the Nazi’s and the white nationalists/supremacists… then since they are all different groups, you could study each of them on your own if you are interested.

To me, what’s the point? If the goal is peace, how are these groups creating “institutional racism”? How are these groups convincing cops to shoot blacks on sight?

Their numbers are minuscule.

I can do the math on how 40 dedicated black men could get rid of the 8000 (max) KKK members that exist in just a few years.

400 Men could do it in months. Eliminate the entire clan in months. Think about that. If this isn’t a workable solution, then what is? And not by violence. “War is not the answer. Only love can conquer hate.”

But what about your “line crossers”… the army wielding pen toward what end???

Of those “line crossers” you identified… tell me, of all of their work, what concrete suggestion or direction have any of them suggested that “make sense” to you, whatever that may mean?

Please do, by all means, answer this question. Quote for me the “solutions” you admire.

)

    Ryder Spearmann

    Written by