And I have trouble taking seriously a critique that contains its own criticism of other’s content. ‘I know you are but what am I’ isn’t a great argument if you’re trying to prove Milo’s followers aren’t childish. But doubling down with the charge of obliviousness while saying both Milo is a “provocateur” and yet somehow Milo still “cares what his insults mean” in the span of four sentences is just bad writing.

And I have trouble taking seriously a critique that contains its own criticism of other’s content.
5
1
Brent Cottontail Kennedy
Ryder Spearmann
Feb 23, 2017 · 1 min read

So… you have a problem with a critique…. that serves as a critique?

That’s a fascinating theory you have going there.

This new “learning” amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep’s bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.

A provocateur like other forms of hyperbole all have the feature of actually making a point.

Mud slinging is nothing more than trying to make something stick… a vastly different exercise. If you don’t get the distinction, fine… I’m not going to worry about it.

    Ryder Spearmann

    Written by

    Ryder Spearmann

    See responses (1)