Who Would Actually Go to Westworld?
Jason Concepcion
13630

Peter Ghattas, Peter Griffith

Thanks for politicizing this article. Now here’s a chance to explore the topic with some thought.

You think 40% of people are sadistic and wrong and would like to go there because they still support their candidate after decade old recording of him saying something offensive was released. What are your conclusions of the 40% that still support the other candidate? It seems to me there are LOTS of people would like to go there — to be the robot slaves. How do I reach that conclusion? Support for a candidate that:

  • Defended her husband, a proven womanizer and alleged RAPIST (yet former 2-term president), by attacking and slandering his victims. That claims to fight for women and children but laughed about her defense of a man she knows raped a 12 year old girl, ruining her life and preventing her from ever being able to have children.
  • Takes “donations” from foreign countries such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia while in public office, despite the illegality of such influence and the repressive human rights record of those foreign agents. In fact, the Saudi crown prince claims to have funded 20% of her campaign, an investment of over $40 million. Those same people that support her also offer support to ISIS and al Queda, which she has admitted knowledge of. During her time as Sec of State there was a 93% increase in visas granted to the same population that provided the 15 of 19 9/11 hijackers, while also eliminating background checks.
  • Made hundreds of millions of dollars from her public office, having no other occupations during that time.
  • Is pushing for war with Russia.
  • Led the charge for regime change in Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Honduras, and voted for it in Iraq. Then she laughed about the brutal slaughter of Libya’s former dictator, who was raped with a knife before being killed.
  • Runs a “non-profit” Foundation that spends anywhere from 6%-15% of its funds on charity in foreign nations.
  • Used Haiti’s disastrous earthquake to enrich herself and grant unprecedented mineral rights to her brother’s company.
  • Is pushing for war with Russia.
  • Blames all of her misdeeds on others, to the extent that she implicated Abe Lincoln as being responsible for her statements to Wall Street stating that she would treat them differently than her public position implies.
  • Destroyed about 50% of the public records of her time in office, even after being served a subpoena for those records.
  • Has no public achievements to point to from her time in office, though she claims credit for killing Bin Laden.
  • Says there that systemic racism is pervasive in the system she’s been at or near the top of for 25 years. Says all Americans are implicitly biased (racist). Claims to carry hot sauce in her purse when speaking to a black audience. Enjoys using the phrase, “a blast from the Jim Crow past.” Discourages an entire racial group from believing that they will be rewarded for hard work or not killed if they follow police instructions.
  • Is pushing for war with Russia.
  • Desires borderless trade and hemispheric welfare.
  • Promises to raise payroll taxes.
  • Cannot operate a fax machine.
  • Compromised national security and classified information with extreme carelessness.
  • Ignored over 600 requests for increased security in Benghazi, leading to the deaths of 4 Americans when she failed to respond to an attack on the US consulate, then blamed an anti-Islamic Youtube video when she knew it to be an orchestrated terrorist attack.
  • Is pushing for war with Russia.
  • Has a concerning medical history.
  • Wants to increase refugee imports from a hostile region by 550% despite her own admission and that of the intelligence community that those “refugees” cannot be properly vetted because they lack records, and the stated intent and demonstrated success of ISIS to disguise sleeper agents as refugees.
  • Has referred to millions of Americans as “irredeemably deplorable” and encourages people to immigrate to the US to be provided tax-payer funded social services, drive labor prices down, and be granted citizenship to vote without any expectation of integrating.
  • Claims Angela Merkel as Dilma Rousseff as role models.
  • Has a career long history of corruption, incompetence, and lying.
  • Is pushing for war with Russia.

That’s just off the top of my head, though I think I’m leaving more than a few things out. That 40% of the country could support such a candidate, despite the obvious collusion of the major media corporations and majority of both political parties in her favor, is mind-boggling and indicates that those people would like to go to Westworld to be the robot slaves. How else can such support exist, other than that it’s been programmed into her supporters?